查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- On the Principle of Comparative East Asian Philosophy: Nishida Kitarō and Mou Zongsan
- Theory of Personhood in Nishida Kitarō and Mou Zongsan: Reflections on Critical Buddhism's View of the Kyoto School
- 略述天臺圓教「一念無明法性心」之兩重存有論及其特殊義涵
- 西田幾多郎《善的研究》之存有論詮釋--認識之真、倫理之善、藝術之美、宗教之神的一體觀
- 當代新儒學家牟宗三先生在中國哲學底思維形態上之創闢性的建樹與革新
- 中國哲學現代之後的方向與發展:牟宗三先生兩層存有論的意函
- 《老子》哲學的「存有論」
- 工作環境與飲酒行為
- 美國法院對工作場所性騷擾判決之發展趨勢--兼論對我國相關制度之啟示
- 事業單位應如何訂定工作場所性騷擾防治措施
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | On the Principle of Comparative East Asian Philosophy: Nishida Kitarō and Mou Zongsan=東亞哲學比較研究之基礎:西田幾多郎與牟宗三 |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 朝倉友海; | 書刊名 | 中央大學人文學報 |
| 卷 期 | 54 2013.04[民102.04] |
| 頁 次 | 頁1-25 |
| 分類號 | 131.9、131.9 |
| 關鍵詞 | 東亞哲學; 場所; 圓教; 意識的活動; 存有論; East Asian philosophy; Basho; Perfect teaching; Act of consciousness; |
| 語 文 | 英文(English) |
| 英文摘要 | Recent research both on the Kyoto School and on the contemporary New Confucians suggests significant similarities between these two modern East Asian philosophies. Still missing is, however, an explanation of the shared philosophical ideas that serve as the foundation for comparative studies. For this reason, I analyze the basic theories of the two distinctly East Asian philosophies of Nishida Kitarō (1870-1945) and Mou Zongsan (1909-95) so as to identify and extract the same type of argument. This is an alternative to the analyses provided by the previous studies of their philosophies, which inevitably regard their theories as an East Asian assimilation of modern European philosophy in the Kantian, Neo-Kantian, or phenomenological tradition, or else as the traditional tenets under the guise of philosophical speculation, without being able to clarify how these theories contribute to philosophy. My analysis shows that both the logic of basho and the theory of perfect teaching formulate the same type of theory, the ontological or topological-onto-topological-turn from the act of consciousness to its basho or its vertical enfolding, which constitutes the bedrock of East Asian philosophy. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。