頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 論國際海洋法法庭中之臨時措施=The Provisional Measures in the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea |
---|---|
作 者 | 鍾旻珊; | 書刊名 | 中華國際法與超國界法評論 |
卷 期 | 8:2 2012.12[民101.12] |
頁 次 | 頁241-268 |
分類號 | 579.14 |
關鍵詞 | 聯合國海洋法公約; 國際海洋法法庭; 臨時措施; 常設國際法院; 國際法院; Third United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; UNCLOS Ⅲ; International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea; ITLOS; Provisional measures; Permanent Court of International Justice; PCIJ; International Court of Justice; ICJ; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 一九八二年聯合國海洋法公約(一九八二年海洋法公約)建立一套完整詳盡的爭端解決機制,並於一九九六年德國漢堡設立一專門性司法機構-國際海洋法法庭。國際海洋法法庭至今審理過十九個案件,可將案件類型區分為五:包括船隻與船員的迅速釋放(Prompt release of vessels and crews)、臨時措施(Provisional measures)、實質問題(Merits)、海域劃界(Maritime delimitation)以及諮詢意見(Advisory opinion)。本文將探討臨時措施之案件類型。 臨時措施之機制,可回溯至常設國際法院規約之臨時保護制度,以及常設國際法院之法院規則,爾後經國際法院予以修正;一九八二年海洋法公約以及國際海洋法法庭之法庭規則仿效該制度並加以改善。常設國際法院之臨時保護規定當法院不開庭時,授權法院院長為維護當事國各自權利,得指示相應保護措施。 歷經多年演進,一九八二年海洋法公約以及國際海洋法法庭之臨時措施制度,相較過去更臻完善,對爭端當事國之自身權利保障更為完備。 |
英文摘要 | The 1982 UNCLOS III established a comprehensive mechanism for disputes settlement, which became a specialized ITLOS in Hamburg, Germany, 1996. The 19 cases so far handled by ITLOS could be divided into five categories: 1. prompt release of vessels and crews; 2. provisional measures; 3. merits; 4. maritime delimitation; and 5. advisory opinion. Category 2 is the topic of this paper. Institutional origin of provisional measures could be traced back to Interim Protection in the Statute and Rules of Court of PCIJ, which have been amended overtime by ICJ; and imitated and improved upon by UNCLOS III and Rules of Tribunal of ITLOS. The interim protection in the PCIJ authorized the PCIJ President to indicate measures to protect respective rights of parties to a case before the Court when PCIJ was not in session. After years of evolution, the regime of provisional measures in UNCLOS III and the Rules of Tribunal are certainly more satisfactory than before, and much preferred by the parties concerned for the protection of their own rights. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。