相關文獻
- An Exploratory Study on Establishing a Nursing Note Grammar Scale
- 中部地區資訊人力來源及需求之探討
- 家庭保全系統需求與使用因素探討--以臺中地區為例
- 專科生的英語學習動機及其對英語課程之需求分析
- 汽車專業英文縮寫與SRS系統
- 古籍今譯的語言轉換問題
- 營建體系災害防救及居住安全資訊系統
- 國立大學推動教師教育訓練之需求分析
- 國內「人力資源管理」教育之課程規劃及企業之需求評估--以大學企業管理學系為例
- American-Born Chinese Children--Their Performance in Politeness Routines
題 名 | An Exploratory Study on Establishing a Nursing Note Grammar Scale=建立護理紀錄文法量表之研究 |
---|---|
作 者 | 游淑儀; 蘇秀妹; 陳麗芳; |
書刊名 | 長庚科技學刊 |
卷 期 | 17 2012.12[民101.12] |
頁 次 | 頁93-117 |
分類號 | 419.63、419.63 |
關鍵詞 | 專業英文; 需求分析; 語言轉換; ESP; Nursing notes; Scale; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 本研究之目的為發展一份適用於護理人員之英文護理記錄文法量表,並測試此量表之信效度。研究方法採橫斷式研究調查法,收案地點於北部某技術學院護理系,收集五位教授護理英文課程教師及兩百五十位護生資料用來測試本量表之信度、效度、難度、鑑別力、同質性。量表內容係依據廣泛的文獻查證為基礎、參考專家意見分析、專業英文教材調查及實驗結果分析共同發展而來,量表包括八個項目;分別為省略主詞、省略受詞、省略主詞與動詞、省略冠詞、省略BE動詞、被動語態之書寫、縮寫之使用、時態之書寫等,共計四十題。研究結果顯示本量表之信、效度皆佳,但其中兩個文法分項「縮寫之使用」及「時態之書寫」的題目無法有效評量其信度及鑑別度。難度分析顯示其中三個文法分項「省略主詞」、「縮寫之使用」及「時態之書寫」的題目無法有效評量其難度。同質性分析顯示兩個文法分項「縮寫之使用」及「時態之書寫」中部份題目無法與此文法分項中其他題目質性一致。只要透過適當的修正及重測,本量表之建立可作為以後護生或護理專業人員之英文護理紀錄語法程度測試之用,並且對英文護理紀錄文法觀念之評估將是很好很方便的應用工具。 |
英文摘要 | The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to establish a reliable and valid instrument to evaluate the errors in English nursing note writing. To test the reliability, validity, difficulty, discrimination, and corrected item-total correction of the Nursing Note Grammar Scale, five nursing English teachers and two hundred fifty students from a local institute of technology in northern Taiwan participated in the research. A total of eight nursing grammar categories containing forty test questions were established through literature review, discussions with Nursing English faculty, English for Specific Purpose (ESP) materials survey, and administering of the pilot test. The categories selected are Omitting the Subject, Omitting the Object, Omitting the Subject and the Verb BE, Omitting the Article, Omitting the Verb BE, Using Abbreviations, Writing in Passive Voice, and Writing with a Tense. The findings showed that in general, the validity and reliability of the scale were very good except that among the eight grammar categories the reliability and discrimination indexes of the two grammar categories Using Abbreviations and Writing with a Tense did not evaluate what they intended to measure; the difficulty analysis showed that the three grammar categories Omitting the Subject, Using Abbreviation, and Writing with a Tense did not evaluate what was intended to measure; and that for corrected item-total correction analysis some of the items in the two grammar categories Using Abbreviations and Writing with a Tense were not homogeneous with the rest of the items within the same grammar category. With proper modification and retesting, the scale can be used to analyze nursing students' English nursing note grammatical errors and can serve to assess nursing professionals' English nursing note grammar proficiency. |