查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 非法人團體之當事人能力、當事人適格及其判決效力--交錯於實體法與程序法之問題
- 涉及非法人團體之當事人適格及訴訟擔當
- 合夥人之補充性給付與執行力之擴張--最高法院六十七年度臺上字第二七四號判決及七十四年度臺上字第二三六九號判決之評釋
- 共有物返還訴訟之再考--代表訴訟法理與事後程序參與之連結與交錯
- 程序選擇權與訴訟當事人(下)--二○○四年最高法院有關民事訴訟法裁判之新開展
- 第三人撤銷訴訟之原告當事人適格
- 公寓大廈管理委員會之當事人能力、當事人適格及判決效力--簡評最高法院九八年度臺上字第七九○號民事判決
- 程序選擇權與訴訟當事人(上)--二○○四年最高法院有關民事訴訟法裁判之新開展
- 當事人能力爭議問題之研析
- 非法人團體之當事人能力、適格及選定當事人:以公寓大廈管理委員會為例
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 非法人團體之當事人能力、當事人適格及其判決效力--交錯於實體法與程序法之問題=Party's Capacity of an Unincorporated Association and Effects of Judgment |
---|---|
作 者 | 沈冠伶; | 書刊名 | 政大法學評論 |
卷 期 | 120 2011.04[民100.04] |
頁 次 | 頁95-157 |
分類號 | 586.116 |
關鍵詞 | 非法人團體; 合夥; 公寓大廈管理委員會; 當事人能力; 當事人能力之機能論; 當事人適格; 訴訟擔當; 既判力; 執行力擴張; 責任財產範圍; 程序保障; Unincorporated association; Partnership; Apartment building management committee; Capacity of party; Functional capacity of the parties; Proper party; Derivative action; Range of responsible property; Procedural protection; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 非法人團體之當事人能力與當事人適格之要件、準據不同,應分別判定。在非法人團體及構成員均有當事人能力與當事人適格時,原告得基於其程序選擇權,衡量個案之實體利益及程序利益後選擇列何人為當事人。在非法人團體作為當事人所進行之訴訟,有關訴訟標的之權利義務關係在實體法上之主體係構成員全體,非法人團體係以訴訟擔當人身分進行訴訟,判決效力應及於全體構成員。但得作為執行之標的,應視其責任財產範圍而定。在非法人社團,僅以社團財產為限;在合夥團體,向來實務承認就合夥債權債務關係所為之判決,得直接對合夥人個人財產予以執行之見解,則有對合夥人個人欠缺程序保障之疑慮。合夥人個人依民法第六八一條於合夥財產不足時所負之連帶責任,並非合夥團體所進行訴訟之訴訟標的,因此,對於合夥人僅就合夥債權債務關係生既判力,而此僅係合夥人個人所負連帶責任之先決法律關係,對於合夥連帶債務而言,尚未具既判力及執行力之裁判。至於公寓大廈管理委員會具有合夥及非法人社團之部分特徵,屬於中間型態之無權利能力團體,宜視訴訟標的之權利義務關係,分別判定其既判力及執行力之範圍。 |
英文摘要 | This paper analyses the capacity of an unincorporated association (such as a partnership) to be a party to civil procedure, said party's standing to bring suit in a particular dispute and the effects of the judgment of a suit. An unincorporated association has no legal capacity under substantive law but does have the capacity to be a party to civil procedure and to stand on behalf of its members. However, the capacity to be a party and the standing to bring suit must be determined separately for they have different elements. Based on the theory of Procedural Option Rights, when an unincorporated association and its members have both party capacity and standing to sue, the plaintiff has the right to select an association as the sole defendant or all members as multiple defendants by weighing the procedural interests against the material interests. Partnerships or apartment building management committees are examples of unincorporated associations. The judgment against a partnership is not only binding on the parties but also on all partners who did not appear as parties in the suit. However, because the subject matter of a suit against a partnership is different from a suit against partners for joint liability, the creditor should not enforce a judgment of partnership against the individual property of one partner. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。