查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 單次間歇訓練中休息方式對於耐力選手之影響
- 不同羽球訓練方式負荷強度之研究
- 中長距離跑步選手生理、生化值之比較
- 急性低壓低氧對上肢30秒最高與平均功率的影響
- 閾值能力對300m最大速度跑之乳酸堆積與血糖濃度調節之影響
- Physiological and Notational Comparison of New and Old Scoring Systems of Singles Matches in Men's Badminton
- 跑步熱身運動結合血流限制對生理反應與運動表現的影響
- 呼吸肌訓練對男性鐵人三項選手訓練效果之影響
- 咖啡因對中高強度間歇運動後超額攝氧量的影響
- 大學男子羽球選手專項有氧動力測驗方式的評估
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 單次間歇訓練中休息方式對於耐力選手之影響=Effect of Rest Strategies during Single Interval Training on Endurance Runners |
---|---|
作者 | 李綿綿; 王錠堯; 楊孫錦; 王再彬; 黃濬棋; Lee, Mien-mien; Wang, Ting-yao; Yang, Sun-chin; Wang, Tsai-pin; Huang, Jiun-chi; |
期刊 | 運動研究 |
出版日期 | 20100600 |
卷期 | 19:1 2010.06[民99.06] |
頁次 | 頁75-83 |
分類號 | 528.9012 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 無氧閾值; 有氧閾值; 血乳酸; 心跳率; Aerobic threshold; Anaerobic threshold; Blood lactate; Heart rate; |
中文摘要 | 目的:探討 4mmol/l 速度間歇訓練以固定時間 40 秒 (time determinant, TD) 與回到 2mmol/l 心跳率 (heart rate determinant, HRD) 休息方式對於中長距離選手的影響。方法: 受試者為 8 名青少年男性中長距離選手,年齡 16.6 ± 0.5 歲、身高 171.1 ± 3.8 公分、體重 61.3 ± 6.0 公斤。受試者先接受漸增強度跑步測驗後一週,以平衡次序接受不同休息方式的 4mmol 速度 (3.8 ± 0.3 m/s) 間歇訓練 (2 sets × 5 reptitions × 3 min),兩次訓練至少間隔 48 小時。記錄訓練中第 1、3、5、6、8、10 次 (reptition, rep)後及訓練結束後第 3、5 分鐘的 血乳酸 (blood lactate, La) 與心跳率 (heart rate, HR)。測驗結果使用相依樣本二因子變異數 分析進行比較,顯著水準訂為 p<.05。結果:不同休息方式對於訓練中 La 有交互作用 (F=10.52, p <.05),而 HR 則無 (p >.05);TD 訓練後第 3 分鐘的 La 顯著高於 HRD,但 HR 無顯著差異。TD 時,rep 3 (3.09 ± 0.16 mmol/l) 及 rep 8 (2.86 ± 0.17 mmol/l) 的 La 與 rep 1 (3.93 ± 0.14 mmol/l) 有顯著差異 (p<.05) ,HR 隨著反覆逐漸上升;HRD 時,rep 5、rep 8、 rep 10 (2.79 ± 0.16-3.51 ± 0.13 mmol/l) 的 La 顯著低於 rep1 (3.85 ± 0.11 mmol/l),而 HR 亦 隨著反覆而上升。結論:休息方式會影響中長距離選手在單次 4mmol/l 速度間歇訓練中的 肌肉能量代謝,但對於體循環的改變影響不大。 |
英文摘要 | Purpose: To investigate the effect of different rest strategies which were constant time (40 sec, TD) and back to 2mmol/l heart rate (HRD) during the 4mmol/l speed interval training on middle and long distance runners. Methods: Eight male adolescent middle and long distance runners (age: 16.6 ± 0.5 yrs, height: 171.1 ± 3.8 cm, weight: 61.3 ± 6.0 kg) were recruited in this study. Subjects were accepted to increment treadmill tests and after one week, two different rest strategies were applied to 4mmol/l speed (3.8 ± 0.3 m/s) interval running (2 sets×5 reps×3 min) in counter balance order with 48 hours separated. Blood lactate (La) and heart rate (HR) were recorded at 1st, 3rd, 5th, 6th, 8th, and 10th repetition and 3rd, 5th minute after training. Using two-way ANOVA with repeat measures to compare inter- and intra- La and HR during different rest strategies. The significant level was set at p<.05. Results: Interaction was showed on La at different rest strategies during training (F=10.52, p<.05), but it wasn’t on HR (p>.05). After training, La at the 3rd minute of TD was significant higher than HRD, but no difference in HR was found. During the TD, La at rep3 (3.09 ± 0.16 mmol/l) and rep8 (2.86 ± 0.17 mmol/l) were significantly different from rep1 (3.93 ± 0.14 mmol/l) (p<.05) and HR were increased with repetitions (p<.05). During the HRD, the La of rep5, rep8 and rep10 (2.79 ± 0.16-3.51 ± 0.13 mmol/l) were significant lower than rep1 (3.85 ± 0.11 mmol/l) and HR increased with repetitions, too (p<.05). Conclusion: Different rest strategies may affect metabolism of muscle during 4mmol/l speed interval training but no significant effect on circulation. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。