查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 國中生數學補得愈久,數學成就愈好嗎?傾向分數配對法的分析
- Exploring the Relationship between the Size of Classes in Supplemental Instruction and the Achievement of Mathematical Learning
- 偏遠地區與一般地區國中生學習成就差異比較:以「反事實」分析
- 同儕補習風氣對國中生學習成就之影響
- 國中讀前段班有差嗎?能力分班對學習成就影響的反事實分析
- 綜合高中分流政策對學生學習成就的影響:以TEPS資料分析為例
- 國中學生課業補習效果之探討
- 補習數學有用嗎?--一個「反事實」的分析
- 班級內與班級間數學表現差異:跨國與跨年級比較
- 班級同質程度、家庭背景及數學表現:運用雙重差分法的跨國分析
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 國中生數學補得愈久,數學成就愈好嗎?傾向分數配對法的分析=Effects of Cram Schooling on Math Performance in Junior High : A Propensity Score Matching Approach |
---|---|
作 者 | 關秉寅; 李敦義; | 書刊名 | 教育研究集刊 |
卷 期 | 56:2 2010.06[民99.06] |
頁 次 | 頁105-139 |
分類號 | 521.68 |
關鍵詞 | 補習; 數學成就; 傾向分數配對; 臺灣教育長期追蹤資料庫; Cram schooling; Math performance; Propensity score matching; Taiwan Education Panel Survey(TEPS); |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 先前的研究發現,國三學生參與數學補習雖有正面的效果,但效果值並不大。由於補習是放學後一種補充性的學習活動,一項合理的假設是:開始補習的時間愈久,補習的效果也會愈好。本文使用台灣教育長期追蹤資料庫(Taiwan Education Panel surve,TEPS)追蹤樣本驗證此種假設是否成立。 依據開始補習數學的時間, TEPS 的國中樣本可區分出國一到國三上學期都有補習者、國二開始補習者、國三開始補習者,以及國中期間從未補習者等四種類型。本文運用傾向分數配對法進行資料分析,以國中期間從未補習者做為對照組,分別探討前三種補習類型,若在不給予補習的情況下,其補習數學的平均效果為何? 研究結果發現:一、數學補習的時間愈久,補習者與不補習者間,在個人特性與家庭背景等的差異處就愈多;二、從國二開始補習數學者的平均效果值最大,以滿分 100 分的情況來看,其效果值約為三分。從國一開始連續補習,或者從國三開始補習,其效果值都不明顯。 |
英文摘要 | Our previous research has shown that cram schooling in 9th grade in Taiwan has a positive but fairly small effect on math performance. Since cram schooling is supplementary learning after school, it is possible that the earlier a student starts participating in cram schooling, the bigger the effect is. We explore this possibility by using the core panel data of the Taiwan Education Panel Survey (TEPS). We identify four types of students in terms of the length of their participation in math cramming during junior-high school years. We use the method of propensity score matching (PSM) to explore the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT) by comparing those who have participated in math cramming since 7th, 8th, and 9th grade separately with those who have never had math cramming during junior-high years. With different matching estimators, all results of PSM analysis indicate small or no effect of cram schooling on math performance, irrespective of how long the math cramming is. The largest ATT found is for those who have participated in math cramming since the 8th grade. The size of the effect is around 3 points if the highest math ability score is 100. For those who undertake math cramming since the 7th grade or only in the 9th grade,.there are virtually no gains from cram scholing. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。