查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 自然科創意與批判思考教學對國小學生學習動機、批判思考及科學創造力之研究
- 高中學生電腦網路使用習慣與網路學習觀點調查
- 國小資優生的學習動機、批判思考與其國語科學業成就之關係
- 網路健康資訊之批判思考技能發展之方案規劃研究
- 學生學習動機與學業成就關聯之研究:教師創意教學的多層次調節式中介效果
- 排球創意教學:以提高反應速度和場地移動敏捷性為例
- A Case Study on English Teachers' Self-Introductions Upon Meeting New Classes Using a Motivating Learning Activity
- 《禮記.學記篇》之教育哲學思想
- Achievement Motivation in Learning English:Ability Groups and Normal Groups Compared at the Military Academies
- 提昇學習動機的教師行為
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 自然科創意與批判思考教學對國小學生學習動機、批判思考及科學創造力之研究=Influence of the Creative and Critical Teaching on Learning Motivation, Critical Thinking, and Scientific Creativity of the Fifth-grade Students |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 吳文龍; 黃萬居; | 書刊名 | 科學教育月刊 |
| 卷 期 | 304 2007.11[民96.11] |
| 頁 次 | 頁12-28 |
| 分類號 | 523.36 |
| 關鍵詞 | 創意教學; 學習動機; 批判思考; 科學創造力; Creative teaching; Learning motivation; Critical thinking; Scientific creativity; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| 中文摘要 | 本文旨在探討自然科創意教學模組(以下簡稱CCT)結合批判思考教學的理念,對學生學習動機、批判思考能力及科學創造力之影響。本文仿所羅門四組實驗設計(Solomon four-group design),以台北市中正區DM 國小五年級四個班級共138 名學生為實驗對象,採量為主、質為輔的研究方法,以此教學模組進行教學活動。探討面向包括有對學生學習動機、批判思考能力及創造力的影響。在創造力測驗的部份參考國內相關創造力測驗,發展出自然科領域的創造力評量工具—科學創造力測驗(SCE),並於教學過程中觀察記錄學生質性的批判思考與創造思考反應,以求研究的面向的完整和周延。 研究結果發現,CCT 對學生自然科學習動機有顯著的提升,但在各分量表間存有差異,兩組接受教學處理學生亦存有相當的個別差異;對學生科學創造力有顯著提升,在各分項方面流暢力、開放性、變通力、精密力及科學性皆達顯著差異,但兩組接受CCT教學處理學生存有相當的個別差異;對學生自然科批判思考無顯著的提升,在各分量表亦無顯著提升。 |
| 英文摘要 | This study, integrating creative teaching with critical thinking module, investigated the influence of the Creative and Critical Teaching (CCT) on learning motivation, critical thinking, and scientific creativi ty. Reference to Solomon four-group design, there were four c lasses selected from f i f th grade of DM Primary School in Jhongjheng Dis tr ict, Taipei City and assigned into the two experimental and two control groups randomly. The quantitative method used four different kinds of ins truments. Those were Science Learning Mot ivation Progressing Questionnaire (SLMQ), Science Critical Thinking Examination (SCTE), Science Creativity Examination (SCE) and Wi l l i am c reativi ty assessment packet (CAP). The qualita tive methods included researcher's teaching record books, classroom observations memo, semi- s tructured interview and the students' progressing papers. The resul ts from two-way ANOVA and ANCOVA showed that: 1. Ther e is s ignif icant d ifference between experiment and control g roup a t SLMQ. 2. Ther e is s ignif icant d ifference between experiment and control group at SCE, including f luency、openness、f lexibi l i ty、precision and science. 3. There is no signif icant difference between experimental and control group at SCTE. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。