頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 論陳建《學蔀通辨》之貢獻與失誤=Some Observations on Chen Chien's the Clarification of the Veiled Theories(Hsueh-Pu-Tung-Pien): It's Merits and Flaws |
---|---|
作 者 | 蔡龍九; | 書刊名 | 國立臺灣大學哲學論評 |
卷 期 | 36 2008.10[民97.10] |
頁 次 | 頁149-191 |
分類號 | 125.5 |
關鍵詞 | 學蔀通辨; 道一編; 朱子晚年定論; 朱陸異同; 朱陸調和; The Clarification of the Veiled Theories; Hsueh-Pu-Tung-Pien; The Later Chu Hsi: The Conclusion; Chu-Tzu-Wan-Nien-Ting-Lun; The Way Is One; Tao-I-Pien; The similarities and dissimilarities between Chu and Lu; Reconciliation and combination of Chu and Lu; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文探究《學蔀通辨》對於《朱子晚年定論》、《道一編》等傾向於朱陸調和之作品,所提出的批評內容。分別探討《學蔀通辨》中的合理處與失誤處,並說明理由,以及此書批評效果。最後,衡定《學蔀通辨》,並總結此書的貢獻及失誤,依此反省「朱陸異同」之爭論,是否有更清晰的處理方式。 |
英文摘要 | This paper aims to explore Chen Chien's The clarification of the Veiled Theories (Hsueh-Pu-Tung-Pien), specifically his comments on Wang Yang-ming's The Later Chu Hsi: The Concusion (Chu-Tzu-Wan-Nien-Ting-Lun) and Cheng Min-cheng's The Way Is One (Tao-I-Pien), which according to Chen, suffer from the same fault of reconciling and combining Chu Hsi and Lu Hsiang-shan. I will begin with a thorough investigation on Chen's comments, sorting out as well as explaining the book's merits and flaws, and weight its intended effect. I endeavor to reevaluate this book in the hope of bring out a more constructive perspective on the issues concerning the reflections on the similarities and dissimilarities between Chu and Lu. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。