頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 「朱陸異同爭論史」中的保守調和模式--李紱《朱子晚年全論》評析=The Moderate Reconciliation Approach of "The History of the Controversy over the Similarities and Dissimilarities between Zhu and Liu": A Critique of Li Fu's Zhu Zi Wan Nian Quan Lun (The Later Zhu Zi) |
---|---|
作者 | 蔡龍九; Tsai, Lung-chiu; |
期刊 | 東吳哲學學報 |
出版日期 | 20130200 |
卷期 | 27 2013.02[民102.02] |
頁次 | 頁1-31 |
分類號 | 125.5 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 朱子晚年全論; 朱陸異同; 朱熹; 陸象山; 李紱; Zhu Zi Wan Nian Quan Lun; The Later Zhu Zi; The similarities and dissimilarities between Zhu and Liu; Zhu Zi; Liu Xiang Shan; Li Fu; |
中文摘要 | 本文簡要敘述「朱陸異同」的爭論思想史脈絡下,其中採取調和立場的李紱所著之《朱子晚年全論》的內容要旨,並探討其中的得失。筆者發現,李紱雖屬「調和朱陸」立場,但他的資料引用以及評論內容相較於前人來說較為詳盡、中肯,而且有獨到的看法。亦即他區分「朱子與陸子之學」與「朱子與陸子互論」下的不同,來考察兩人思想上「可同」的內容。另方面,除了說明李紱的貢獻之外,亦針對《朱子晚年全論》的內容作出評析,點出此書的貢獻及其失誤之處。 |
英文摘要 | Li Fu, a reconciler of ”the similarities and dissimilarities between Zhu and Liu”, elucidates this controversial history in his ”Zhu Zi Wan Nian Quan Lun” (”The Later Zhu Zi”), which I aim to evaluate and criticize. In my opinion, although Li adopts a reconciliatory position, he sets himself apart by his exhaustive quotations and insightful comments. He distinguishes ”the thinkings of Zhu and Liu” from ”the critical exchanges between Zhu and Liu” to scrutinize their compatibility. In addition to the attempt to elucidate Li's contribution, I also evaluate ”Zhu Zi Wan Nian Quan Lun” (”The Later Zhu Zi”) in terms of its contribution and flaws. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。