查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 訴訟途徑錯誤的處置--民事法院與行政法院之間訴訟案件的移送制度
- 新審判權爭議解決機制之實務運作--觀察行政法院如何處理刑事訴訟之審判權爭議
- 審判權錯誤及審判權衝突之研究(下)--兼評法院組織法草案第七條至第十條、民訴法第一八二條之一及司法院釋字第五四○號解釋
- 審判權錯誤及審判權衝突之研究(上)--兼評法院組織法草案第七條至第十條、民訴法第一八二條之一及司法院釋字第五四○號解釋
- 審判權、國際管轄權與訴訟途徑
- 論地方自治機關間行政爭訟之可能性及其進行程序--以德國法制之比較為中心
- 聯邦德國中行政審判權對行政的控制
- 聯邦德國中行政審判權對行政的控制
- 聯邦德國中行政審判權對行政的控制
- 聯邦德國中行政審判權對行政的控制
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 訴訟途徑錯誤的處置--民事法院與行政法院之間訴訟案件的移送制度=Handling Cases at Inappropriate Courts by Wrong Course of Law |
---|---|
作 者 | 陳啟垂; | 書刊名 | 興大法學 |
卷 期 | 3 2008.05[民97.05] |
頁 次 | 頁1-32 |
分類號 | 586.5 |
關鍵詞 | 訴訟途徑; 司法權; 審判權; 民事法院; 行政法院; 移送; Rechtsweg; Course of law; Jurisdiction to adjudicate; Jurisdiction; Civil court; Administrative court; Transfer; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 我國普通法院分設民事庭負責民事訴訟事件的審判,及刑事庭負責刑事訴訟事件的審判;另外,行政法院負責行政訴訟事件的審判。此依法將審判權劃歸不同支系的法院行使,以提供權利保護的的程序,稱為訴訟途徑。原告為請求權利保護而起訴,必須依其事件的性質,循正確的訴訟途徑向各該管轄法院提起;若是循錯誤的訴訟途徑,則該訴訟即因受訴法院無管轄權而不合法。 對於原告雖循正確訴訟途徑,但卻向無管轄權的法院起訴,不管民事訴訟法或行政訴訟法均設有移送管轄法院的規定;對於原告循錯誤訴訟途徑而向無管轄權的法院起訴,民事訴訟法或修正前行政訴訟法卻欠缺相對應之類似的移送規定,反而不合理地規定應以裁定駁回起訴。 在同支系法院間設有管轄錯誤的移送規定,在不同支系法院間,亦應設有管轄錯誤的移送規定,否則當事件性質不明確或各支系法院各持己見時,將造成人民無法尋求有效的權利保護,實有違憲法保障訴訟權的精神。行政訴訟法第十二條之二的增訂,是在不同支系法院間設計合理的移送制度上踏出第一步,也更符合憲法保障訴訟權的精神。 |
英文摘要 | There are ordinary courts in which are set up into two divisions: the civil division is responsible for the trial of civil actions and the criminal division for the trial of the criminal suit. In addition there is administrative court for the administrative litigation. This incorporates jurisdiction into the court of different offsprings to exercise in accordance with the law, the procedure of the ones that protect in order to offer the right, is called the course of law. When a plaintiff brings an action to the court, the plaintiff he must follow the correct course of law according to the character of his lawsuit. Both the Civil Procedure Code and the Administrative Procedure Code stipulate that the court which receives a no judgeable case should transfer the action to court which is suitable. But, if plaintiff brings an action no following the course of law, as a result, his lawsuit is illegal and the court is not able to judge. Once the plaintiff brings an action following the correct course of law to the court without jurisdiction, the Civil Procedure Code or the Administrative Procedure Code enact the reasonable stipulations of lawsuit transference. But if the plaintiff brings an action no following the course of law to the court, either the Civil Procedure Code or the Administrative Procedure Code is lack of the corresponding similar regula-tion of lawsuit transference. There ar the stipulations of lawsuit transference among the courts in same branch. There should be a similar regulation of lawsuit transference among the courts in different branches. Otherwise, when the character of action is indeterminate, or when courts in different branches stick to one,s own view, will cause the people to be unable to seek the effective protection of right. The lack of regulation to allow lawsuit transference between different court branches violates the spirit of constitution to ensure the Taiwan's citizen to the right of litigation. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。