查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 紙筆與電腦工具對設計專家與設計生手草圖行為的評估與分析
- 平面設計過程中使用傳統工具與電腦工具的草圖行為研究
- 個案教學法在視覺傳達設計課程教學之研究
- 強化建築訓練裡的都市設計教育
- Research on the Internship System Oriened Towards Nurturing Professional Design Ability--The Example of Visual Communication Design Education
- 建築教育中的設計工作室--以淡江大學建築系為例
- 電腦工具與交易者決策制定關係的省思
- 建築教育中的評圖制度
- 真空注型模型製作於設計教學中之研究
- 美術、設計、廣告教育現況--臺灣區112所設計相關科系院校調查表
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 紙筆與電腦工具對設計專家與設計生手草圖行為的評估與分析=Evaluation and Analysis of Designer Experts and Novices' Sketching Activities with Traditional and Digital Tools |
---|---|
作者 | 陳慧霞; 游萬來; Chen, Hui-hsia; You, Manlai; |
期刊 | 藝術教育研究 |
出版日期 | 20071200 |
卷期 | 14 2007.12[民96.12] |
頁次 | 頁61-95+97-99 |
分類號 | 962 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 草圖行為; 紙筆工具; 設計生手; 設計專家; 電腦工具; 設計教育; Digital tool; Computer; Expert designer; Novice designer; Sketching; Traditional tool; Paper & pencil; Design education; |
中文摘要 | 電腦工具改變了設計行為,開啟電腦輔助概念設計議題的探討,不同經驗的設計專家與生手,因不同工具的使用造成草圖行為的差異。基於兩大議題的整合性,本研究目標:比較設計專家與生手在概念設計階段使用電腦與紙筆工具,第一,草圖行為的差異?不同特徵的草圖行為表現?第二,設計者與草圖進行溝通互動的過程(「看」與「動」的行為)分析?第三,構想過程與構想成果的異同?第四,提出兼具量化與質性的評估工具(2 構面與6 大指標)分析方法來紀錄與解構草圖行為。結果發現使用紙筆工具的設計專家與生手有別於使用電腦工具的草圖行為,包含草圖數量多、獨特性高、思考流暢度佳、較佳的構想搜尋模式等;專家的概念構想模式,可作為生手提升為專家的學習目標;專家與生手皆指出電腦工具的視覺化特性不會明顯影響進行設計問題的評估,但使用紙筆工具,卻可以快速表達構想、易於觀察圖像造形與執行「判斷的看」動作,同時所產生的觸覺心理因素,是電腦工具無法取代的。 |
英文摘要 | Computer tool has changed the behavior of design, and explore the issues of computer aided conceptual design. Designers’ sketching and thinking have been changed in accordance with different design tools in the conceptual stage. This study explores and analyzes the comparison between designers’ sketching in traditional and digital tools. The aims are: 1.Comparing the differences of novice and expert designers’ sketching with traditional and digital tools and finding some characteristics to decompose sketching; 2.Proposing a method on analyzing the interactive communication process (seeing-moving-seeing); 3.Detecting the similarities as well as differences on conceptual process and its outcomes; 4.Proposing a technique that consists of qualitative and quantitative analysis to record designers’ sketching and identify 2 dimensions and 6 characteristics. Results show that traditional tool has advantages over the digital tool, such as more number of sketches generated, higher originality of sketches, excellent fluency of design thinking, an ideal approach for concept generation adapted, etc. This study provides an expert’s approach for concept generation in order to make it a learning motivation for novices to upgrade to expert designers and a reference for design education. Both experts and novices have stated that visualization of computer tools would not exert an apparent compact on design evaluation and application. With traditional tool, however, it would be easier for them not only to express their ideation, but also to observe the sketches with judgment. Finally, computer tools can never replace traditional tool in the way that the latter can influence people physiologically through their tactility. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。