查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 《荀子集釋.天論》中關於「科學」一條的詮釋
- Three Translations of Xunzi--"Tianlun"
- 人能弘道.道通為一:心理學本土化的方法論挑戰及其回應
- 藉反省式教學方式探究師院生的自然科教學觀
- 語言在自然科教室內的意涵:一間後山教室內教學活動的記事
- Bases Filosoficas, Psicologicas y Sociologicas de la Coherencia Linguistica
- 「通」與「儒」:荀子的通變觀與經典詮釋問題
- 從「分別」到「職分」--論「荀子.天論」中「天人之分」的架構
- 建構組織知識系統的研究探索方法論雛議
- 從詮釋論的角度評楊國樞的本土化社會科學觀
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 《荀子集釋.天論》中關於「科學」一條的詮釋=The Interpretation of Science in "The Explanation of Xunzi--The Discussion of the Sky" |
---|---|
作 者 | 鄭源發; | 書刊名 | 成大宗教與文化學報 |
卷 期 | 9 2007.12[民96.12] |
頁 次 | 頁11-28 |
分類號 | 121.27 |
關鍵詞 | 荀子; 天論; 科學; 語言學; 詮釋; Xunzi; The discussion of the sky; Science; Linguistics; Interpretation; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 「知」為荀子學說的核心,歷來亦因而引發相關對於「荀子」與「科學」二者之間的論述。基於李滌生先生所言:「他的思想方式是科學的,卻沒有開出科學來」。的共識下,以〈天論〉一篇做為討論的基礎,利用語言邏輯的方法,就該言的語意進行分析,可得知,所謂「他的思想方式是科學的」,係指稱荀子的思考方法深具「科學精神」,此一精神與西方素有的懷疑精神可相呼應,而荀子〈天論〉中對自然意志的批判,甚可視為針為「絕對」而懷疑的絕佳示範,因而可確定,所謂「他的思想方式是科學的」,應詮釋為「荀子的思考方法是具備科學精的思想方法」。 而後句「卻沒有開出科學來」顯然是評論者對於荀子在科學領域的評價,故此「科學」應釋為狹義的自然科學。而就荀子思想的特質、荀子批判名家墨家的行為,以及西方自祭科學的特質等面向探討,可得知荀子之思考方法雖具科學精神,但其思想根底卻是傾向「人文」的,就此而論,則荀子無能開出自然科學領域的成就便是既定的成果論。但此一既定結果不應用以評價荀子能否開出科學的功過,若想對荀子做成就式的是非評價,則應運用歷史式的考察方法,同時論述主客觀因素,才能涉及,也才算公允。 |
英文摘要 | “Knowing/Knowledge,” the core of Xunzi’s philosophy, has long stimulated discourses about “Xunzi” and “science”. Based on Di Li, who said “His(Xunzi’s) style of thinking is scientifically based but does not create science”, and based on “the Discussion of the Sky”, I analyzed Xunzi’s philosophy with linguistic logicality. I found that “his style of thinking is scientifically based” resonates skepticism in the west. In “the Discussion of the sky”, the way that Xunzi criticized the Nature is a best example of speculating about “the Absoulate”. Therefore that “his style of thinking is scientifically based” can be interpreted as “Xunzi’s style of thinking is equipped with the spirit of science.” The latter part of what Di Li said “but does not create science” is obviously how critics view Xunzi in the field of science; hence “science” in the sentence should be narrowly defined as nature science. However, after studying Xunzi’s philosophy from three different perspectives: the features of his philosophy, his criticism of Ming and Muo, and the features of western science, I found that though Xunzi’s thinking style is scientific, his root of thinking tends to tilt toward humanity. That is, the fact that Xunzi did not have achievements in that field of science. If any one wants to evaluate Xunzi, then he/she need adopt historical methods of investigation and discuss the results both subjectively and objectively. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。