查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 市售漏蘆藥材之鑑別
- 談漏蘆與藜蘆
- 鑑別, 培養, 與發展--兒童的多元智力能力
- 人體站姿平衡系統鑑別
- 盧一尼神經心理測驗組之中文修訂與常模建立研究
- Differential Display of mRNA in Human Lung Tissue and in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Preliminary Report
- 石綿鏡檢效率受粉塵干擾影響之研究
- 市售白前白薇藥材之鑑別
- The Role of Red Blood Cell Distribution Width in the Differential Diagnosis of Microcytic Anemia
- 飼料鑑別與顯微鏡檢查
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 市售漏蘆藥材之鑑別=Adulteration and Misusage of Rhapontici Radix in Taiwan |
---|---|
作 者 | 張憲昌; 溫彩玉; 徐雅慧; 林哲輝; | 書刊名 | 藥物食品檢驗局調查研究年報 |
卷 期 | 25 2007.10[民96.10] |
頁 次 | 頁98-109 |
分類號 | 414.32 |
關鍵詞 | 漏蘆; 藜蘆; 鑑別; Rhaponticum uniforum; Echinops latifolius; Identified; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 漏蘆(Rhapontici Radix)為常用中藥之一,《神農本草經》列為上品,具清熱解毒、排膿通乳等功效,其基原為菊科(Compositae)植物祁州漏蘆Rhaponticum uniforum (L.) DC.或禹州漏蘆 Echinops latifolius Tausch.(2)的乾燥根。此兩種係同科不同屬植物,成分及藥理作用不盡相同。祁州漏蘆具有抗真菌、抗動脈粥樣硬化及抗氧化等作用。禹州漏蘆則有降血壓、中樞神經系統興奮等作用。根據歷代典籍記載,本草學家對此類藥材基原爭議頗多,使用上常有混用情形。本研究為了解市售漏蘆類藥材之使用情形,搜集祁州漏蘆、禹州漏蘆及藜蘆等對照藥材利用性狀特徵、組織鏡檢及理化鑑別之薄層層析法予以探討,並建立鑑別方法。本局並以逢機取樣方式價購北、中、南三地區中藥材店之漏蘆藥材40件,並與對照藥材及文獻比對鑑定其基原。鑑定結果顯示,39件為正品,其中24件(60%)為祁州漏蘆,15件(37.5%)為禹州漏蘆。1件(2.5%)檢體為偽品,其基原為藜蘆(Veratrum nigrum L.)。 本研究結果建立漏蘆類藥材之鑑別方法,可供本局及相關機關之業務執行及藥廠業者藥材鑑別之參考。 |
英文摘要 | Rhapontici Radix, a commonly used chinese herb drug, is presented as the first-class drug in Shen Nung Pen Tsao Ching. It has been used for detoxication and anti-inflammation. The botanical origin of Rhapontici radix is Rhaponticum uniforum and Echinops latifolius. The chemical constituents and pharmaceutical effects of those two species are quite different, even though they both belong to Compositae family. The effects of R. uniforum include anti-fungus and against arteriosclerosis, and E. latifolius can be used to lower blood pressure and cause excitation in central nervous system. According to the medical references, a lot of plants have been used as Rhapontici Radix, such as Veratrum nigrum, Echinops grijisii, E. ritro and E. talassicus. In order to clarify the botanical origin of commercial Rhapontici Radix in Taiwan market, R. uniforum, E. latifolius and V. nigrum roots were collected as the authentic materials and 40 samples were purchased from Chinese herbal stores in Taipei, Taichung and Kaoshiung. Samples were identified by morphology, anatomy and thin layer chromatographic analysis. The results showed that 24 of samples (60%) were R. uniforum, 15 (37.5%) were E. latifolius, and only one (2.5%) was adulterant, V. nigrum. The differences among the morphology and histological anatomy of rhizomes and roots can be employed to identify Rhapontici Radix and Veratri Nigri Rhizome Et Radix in the Taiwan herbs market. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。