查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 物質文化--在東西二元論之外
- 文化如何影響經濟?--評Samuel Adrian Adshead, «Material Culture in Europe and China, 1400-1800: The Rise of Consumerism»
- 美國史家史景遷的文化思維--以「胡若望的疑問」、「利瑪竇的記憶之宮」和「文化類同與文化利用」三書為討論中心
- 西方主義的話語?--《黑奴籲天錄》個案研究
- The Other Territories:On the Meaning of the Other Disourse in the Cultural Periphery
- Reading Traditional Chinese Poetics from the West--Three Exemplary Positions
- 符號經濟對於臺灣文化消費市場的關聯性影響
- 沒有東 (方) 的東方主義,東方之外
- The Occidental Theatre and Its Other: The Use and Abuse of the Oriental Theatre in Antonin Artaud
- The Matter of Images: A Post-Colonial Review of Chinese Women in Hollywood Cinema
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 物質文化--在東西二元論之外=Material Culture Beyond the East/West Binary |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 柯律格; | 書刊名 | 新史學 |
| 卷 期 | 17:4 民95.12 |
| 頁 次 | 頁195-215 |
| 分類號 | 630 |
| 關鍵詞 | 物質文化; 設計史; 東方主義; 東方研究; 混雜; 他者; 異國風情; 消費; Material culture; Design history; Orientalism; Orientalist; Hybrid; The other; Exotic; Consumption; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| 中文摘要 | 自早期近代以來,中國出口大量的瓷器、紡織品和繪畫等各種物品到英國。這種物質文化的交流對英國的社會文化、設計史的研究以及博物館的展示產生了深刻的影響,而東西二元論的觀念曾深入其中,形塑了西方人對自我與他者的認識。但近年來在物質文化以及其他的研究領域有不少新的論著,清楚呈現出世界各地物質交流及其文化移轉的豐富面貌,不但挑戰了東西二元論的舊典範,也修正了許多文化概念的缺失。我們應該走出東西二元論的框架之外,重視全球不同地域多元互動的歷史背景,並且拓展觀察的視野,從早期近代、延伸到現代、甚至當代,重新反省東方研究與西方史學、西方與他者以及他者與他者之間的關係。 |
| 英文摘要 | This article provides a brief overview of the progress and shortcomings of the academic discipline of design history, also called material culture studies. One of the most severe shortcomings of design history is that scholars in the past have often used the crude and simplistic East/West binary for analyzing the production and consumption of material culture. This article shows how the East/West binary model has often determined what historians and curators consider as legitimate topics for inclusion into histories and exhibitions of material culture and deign. In fact, the consumptions of artwork is better described with the concept of hybridity--as for example 'Westerners' consume and influence the design of works produced in the 'East"--even while we recognize that "hybridity" rests on a false essentialism that denies the heterogeneity of all cultures. Furthermore, inter-Asian exchanges have long been just as important as any set of "East-West" exchanges. The second part of the articles discusses the generally neglected importance of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries to the development of consumer culture, which must also take into account questions of production. Modern material culture (1800-1950 and beyond) is particularly resistant to categorization as 'eastern' or 'western'. In the final analysis, we must abandon the binary 'East/West' to understand the workings of material culture in the modern world. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。