查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 沒有東 (方) 的東方主義,東方之外
- 美國史家史景遷的文化思維--以「胡若望的疑問」、「利瑪竇的記憶之宮」和「文化類同與文化利用」三書為討論中心
- 西方主義的話語?--《黑奴籲天錄》個案研究
- 全球文化流動中的論述暴力與邊緣議題--以張煒的「外省書」及譚恩美的「百種神秘感覺」為例
- The Other Territories:On the Meaning of the Other Disourse in the Cultural Periphery
- Reading Traditional Chinese Poetics from the West--Three Exemplary Positions
- 狗臉的歲/水月:列維納斯與動物
- 自然作為他者:列維納斯與環境哲學的交會
- 照護他者:列維納斯與護理關懷
- 羽球雙打搭檔關係研究:以他者為中心的反省
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 沒有東 (方) 的東方主義,東方之外=Orientalism without Orient(ation), or the Other Orient |
---|---|
作 者 | 邱德亮; | 書刊名 | 文化研究 |
卷 期 | 10 2010.06[民99.06] |
頁 次 | 頁69-102 |
分類號 | 541.101 |
關鍵詞 | 東方主義; 重異能力; 他者; 列維納斯; 本質化; 其他等等; Orientalism; Iterability; Other; Lévinas; Essentialization; Other-wise; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 近30年來「東方主義」獲得普世的成功。各地學者紛紛以此分析西方如何建構東方的他者,也揭露自身內部的東方主義。原本即無東方的東方主義,在後薩依德的當代,東方主義已經是沒有東方,也沒有方向。失去了東(方),並不意謂失去了意義,反而更保留著一種直覺:作為文化象徵體系中,上下支配關係之提喻。然而,從東方學者、薩依德到後薩依德,「東方主義」形成另一種理論旅行和文本態度。本文借用德希達的「重異能力」分析這種東方主義在不同的脈絡之下,重覆又差異的能力及其意義。而東方主義的重異能力正蘊含著東方的他者。本文試圖以列維納斯倫理哲學,重新思考東方作為他者/其他的意義,亦即將東方放在超驗的絕對他者位置,重估被本質化、被僵固化的東方與西方之關係。東方作為他者的其他,其他的他者,也許是指向永遠開放性,沒有東方的東方主義,同時也指涉與東方共在又此外的他者以及其他等等…… |
英文摘要 | In the past 30 years, “the Orientalism” has been a big success on a global scale. Inspired by “the Orientalism”, the scholars, one after another, expose how the Oriental other is constructed and denounce the Orientalism in their own countries. Therefore, with regard to its orient(ation), post-Said Orientalism has neither the Orient nor orientation, though Orientalism is founded on the absence of the Orient from the very beginning. But it does not mean that Orientalism no longer makes any sense; on the contrary, it always keeps a good sense: Orientalism as a metonym for all the dominant/dominated relationship in the symbolic system of culture. The “Orientalism” itself had better be considered as a traveling theory and a textual attitude developed among oriental scholars and others, including E. Said and post- Saidians from 19th century on. This article tries to analyze the ability of Orientalism to repeat and differ in different contexts in terms of J. Derrida’s “iterability” and suggests Orientalism’s always-already-supposed “otherwise”. This article also reevaluates the meanings of the Orient as other(s) in the perspective of E. Lévinas’ ethical philosophy. Putting the Orient in the transcendent position of the absolute other, we reexamine the essentialized and fossilized relation of the Orient and the Occident. The Orient, as another other and other’s wise, signifies the always-openness, which implicates a being-with otherwise and being-out of otherwise (with-out Orient), and so on. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。