查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- The Relation of Biblical Interpretation to the Studies of other Arts: The Synthesis of Philosophical, Theological, and Mystical Languages in Bonaventure's the Reduction of Arts to Theology
- Milisin和Pesah--臺灣原住民教會部落經驗聖經詮釋法之建構
- 在原住民處境中讀經與詮釋的反省
- 信仰尋求理解--卡爾.巴特神學詮釋學的本質與方法
- 如何避免言說「上帝說」:聖經詮釋的否定式神學
- 如何說避免言說上帝說:回應曾慶豹的「如何避免言說「上帝說」:聖經詮釋的否定式神學」
- 聖經詮釋的主觀性與客觀性:與一般詮釋學比論聖經詮釋學的獨特性
- 歷史批判法和社會科學法在「新約」福音書詮釋上的應用及其批判
- 高達美遊戲觀的評估與啟發--遊戲觀與宗教論述
- 女性神學與聖經詮釋
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | The Relation of Biblical Interpretation to the Studies of other Arts: The Synthesis of Philosophical, Theological, and Mystical Languages in Bonaventure's the Reduction of Arts to Theology=聖經詮釋和其它學科之關係:聖伯納文都之《溯諸藝於神學》中哲學、神學及神秘主義語言之融合 |
---|---|
作 者 | 林質心; | 書刊名 | NTU Studies in Language and Literature |
卷 期 | 15 民95.06 |
頁 次 | 頁1-21 |
分類號 | 242 |
關鍵詞 | 聖伯納文都; 亞里斯多德主義; 新柏拉圖主義; 奧古斯丁; 類比; 原形; 經院哲學; 修辭學; 聖經; 聖經詮釋; Bonaventure; Aristotelianism; Neoplatonism; Augustine; Similitude; Exemplar; Scholasticism; Rhetoric; The Bible; Biblical interpretation; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 評論家常以為聖伯納文都 (Bonaventure ) 在《溯諸藝於神學》(De reductione artium ad theologiam ) 中,依循經院哲學的傳統,把聖經研究當作最深奧、最接近真理的一門學科。可是也有評論家指出聖伯納文都其實是採取了神祕主義或奧古斯丁以降的神學傅統,把研讀聖經當作研究其他所有學科的根本。到底聖伯納文都是根據那個傳統將學科分成諸類呢? 本論文將從這些傳統慣用之語言模式來回答這個問題。本論文認為聖伯納文都先採取了亞理斯多德影響下經院哲學論文中的語言,再融合入奧古斯丁以降的神學論文中之修辭學傳統及神祕主義論文中的語言。其論文先似提供學子一個合乎邏輯常理的學習進度表,然後藉由討論聖經研究和其他學科研究之類似性,說服讀者以聖經為研究作為研究其他所有學科的根本。最後聖伯納文都指出這類似性是由神藉作者所賜,故此類比可使讀者在研究任何學科時都可透過受神啟的作者與神合一。簡言之,本論文認為聖伯納文都透過結合經院哲學、神學與神祕主義的語言,精確呈現聖經研究和其他學科研究互相依附的關係。而聖伯納文都更藉融合各個傳統中之語言來描寫一個基督徒如何可在研究中經歷神祕經驗中由神而人、由人而神之互動。 |
英文摘要 | Critics have been studying Bonaventure’s inheritance in The Reduction of Arts to Theology from philosophers in the scholastic, Aristotelian tradition, from theologians in the Neoplatonic, Augustinian tradition, or from mystics who focus more on faith than on learning. Some believe that he represents a certain tradition, and some believe that he is developing a new philosophical system. Most acknowledge that Bonaventure juggles with various traditions, but few focus on how he synthesizes them. This paper studies the two-part structure of the work and the languages used in each section. It explores how Bonaventure starts this treatise like a logician, classifying different arts, becomes to a rhetorical theologian in the middle, and finally provides a metaphysical basis for the rhetorical figures used, making them typological figures and suggesting that the faith in God is what finally enables biblical study and the other arts to work together in effecting a mystical relation between God and man. In short, this paper argues that Bonaventure synthesizes different traditions to strike a balance between biblical study and those of other arts. It also argues that Bonaventure believes that this balance can help readers form a mystical circle with God. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。