頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 《莊子》「樞始得其環中」與龍樹的「中道思想」之比較研究=The Study and Comparison between the "Theory of Getting the Key Point then One Can Get the Balance" by Chuang Chou and the "Theory of Middle Thought" by Nayarjuna |
---|---|
作 者 | 謝易真; | 書刊名 | 慈濟技術學院學報 |
卷期 | 7 民94.09 |
頁次 | 頁189-217 |
分類號 | 121.33、121.33 |
關鍵詞 | 莊子; 龍樹; 中道思想; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 《莊子》學說主要的精神在追求齊物逍遙的境界,面對人世間滾滾紅塵,恢恑憰怪,如何超脫物質的局限,「彼是」如何莫得其偶,在大千世界中,如何取得自在與平衡、超越與和諧?《莊子》提出「樞始得其環中」的相應之道。而龍樹被尊為佛教「八宗共祖」,其主要論著之一《中論》,為其闡發「中道思想」的主要論著,其說亦在求得「超越有無對立」,以證悟「湼槃寂靜」的境界,使人心有究竟依止之處。莊佛二家關係密切,雖然二家文化傳承不同,亦有其歷史流變的差異,然二者思想、精神互有可資對觀之處。本文嘗試研究《莊子》「樞始得其環中」的思想與龍樹「中道思想」的內涵,且將二者之對觀處著眼於「彼是對立」的消解。並於以下三方面探討二者間的關係。第一,二者消解「彼是對立」的方法。第二,二者消解「彼是對立」的過程。第三,二者消解「彼是對立」後所呈現的境界。 |
英文摘要 | The essence of the theory by Chuang Chou is to pursue the state of freedom. Facing the changeable, mundane world, how can one person transcend oneself from the limitation of materialism? How does each other not to become opposed, to gain the freedom and balance, transcend and harmonious in the boundless universe? Chuang Chou put forward the method of the “Theory of Getting the Key Point then One Can Get the Balance.” Nayarjuna was respected as the founder of the eight schools in Buddhism. One of his main theories “Middle Theory” was his important theory to expound and promote his “Middle Thought.” His theory pursued surpassing any opposition to prove the state of Nirvana silence, so human hearts could have a resting place. Chuang chou and Buddhism related to each other closely. Although they had different culture traditions and their histories were different, These two theories could be observed and compared in thought and spirit. This paper tries to study the “Theory of Getting the Key Point then One Can Get the Balance” by Chuang Chou and the content of the “Middle Thought” by Nayarjuna. It will also focus on the dissolution of “Each other opposition.” It will discuss the relationship between these two theories in the following three aspects. First, the method of the dissolution of “Each other opposition.” Second, the process of the dissolution of “Each other opposition.” Third, the state after the dissolution of “Each other opposition.” |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。