查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 《書目答問》與《四庫全書總目》別史類分類之比較=A Comparative Study of Historical Classification of Bie-shi in Shu-mu Da-wen and Si-ku Quan-shu Zong-mu |
---|---|
作者 | 蔡天怡; | 書刊名 | 大學圖書館 |
卷期 | 9:1 民94.03 |
頁次 | 頁143-156 |
分類號 | 023.31 |
關鍵詞 | 書目答問; 四庫全書總目; 別史類; 史部分類; Shu-mu Da-wen; Answers to Inquiries into Bibliography; Si-ku Quan-shu Zong-mu; Annotated Catalog of the Si-ku Collection; The alternative histories; Bie-shi; The historiography categories; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 「別史」是史部類例中較晚出現的,在史部的地位亦相當模糊。雖然可以「上不至於正史,下不至於雜史」概括說明,卻不易清楚戒定其範圍。歷來書目設有別史類者,更是屈指可數。《書目答問》與《四庫全書總目》是近代兩部重要的書目,其史部皆有別史一類。本文乃以此二書目為主,比較其別史類所收圖書分類之異同,希望有助於釐清別史之特性。 |
英文摘要 | The utilization of Bie-shi (alternative histories) as a class in traditional historical classification began in Sung dynasty. Bie-shi is usually defined as “a category which is not as formal as Zheng-shi (Official Dynastic Histories), but not as casual as Za-shi (Miscellaneous histories).” Still, the meaning and coverage of Bie-shi is not quite clear and well-established. It was not a common category employed in traditional historical classification schemes either. Shu-mu Da-wen (Answers to Inquiries into Bibliography) and Si-ku Quan-shu Zong-mu (Annotated Catalog of the Si-ku Collection) are two important bibliographies in Qing Dynasty. They both employed Bie-shi as a category to classify related works. This study attempts to compare and analyze the historical works that were classified in Bie-shi category of these two bibliographies. The goal is to provide a clearer picture about the characteristics of Bie-shi. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。