查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 情感的合理性
- 老人自主性、代間情感與其生活滿意度之關聯
- 從非語言符號談中小學情感教育之建構
- 現代華人家人的互動關係及其心理歷程
- A Study of Negative Affectivity Influencing the Relationships among Social Support, Stressor of Role and Job Burnout
- Broadening the Concepts of Moore's Transactional Distance Theory in the Light of Relevant Adult Education Theories and the New Telecommunications Technologies
- 唐君毅對於孟子思維方式和表達特色的契會與詮釋
- 都市公園使用者休閒態度之研究--以臺北市大安森林公園為例
- 誰怕夜的黑--靈異節目的情感影響與閱聽人歸因判斷之研究
- 涉入程度、內外團體高共識訊息來源與論點品質對說服的影響
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 情感的合理性=The Rationality of Emotion |
---|---|
作 者 | 馬競松; | 書刊名 | 哲學與文化 |
卷 期 | 32:10=377 民94.10 |
頁 次 | 頁35-66 |
分類號 | 171.3 |
關鍵詞 | 情感; 合理性; 自主性; 主觀欲望; 客觀欲望; 範式劇情; Emotions; Rationality; Autonomy; Subjective desires; Objective desires; Paradigm scenarios; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 我們應如何理解情感的合理性?本文第一部分將探求認知和策略兩模型的類比,檢驗它們關於情感欲望的直覺。我區分主觀的和客觀的欲望,進而提出情感具有一個從「範式劇情」導出的語意學,按此我們情感的全部劇目是後天學來的,並且我們情感的形式對象也是固定的。它頗能合乎合理性的一般原則,特別是最低合理性(minima rationality)原則。 本文第二部分轉向合理性這一面。我將探問情感如何對信念、欲望和行為的合理性有貢獻。我將提出一個相當一般性的生物學假說:情感透過控制突顯知覺和推理的特性,使我們免除由於特定困境而在地導致癱瘓;它們藉著暫時模擬知覺信息的簡化,從而限制我們在實踐上和認知上的選擇。 |
英文摘要 | How are we to understand emotional or axiological rationality? I pursue analogies with both the cognitive and the strategic models, testing them against intuitions about emotional desires. We distinguish two different classes of desires, the subjective and the objective, and propose that emotions have a semantics that derives from ”paradigmatic scenarios”, in terms of which our emotional repertoire is learned and the formal objects of our emotions fixed. This fits in well with emerging facts about how our emotional capacities develop, and it can also be squared with the general principles of rationality, particularly minimal rationality. In the second part, I return to the perspective of rationality. I ask how emotions contribute to the rationality of beliefs, desires, and behavior. I proffer a very general biological hypothesis: Emotions spare us the paralysis potentially induced by a particular predicament by controlling the salience of features of perception and reasoning; they temporarily mimic the informational encapsulation of perception and so circumscribe our practical and cognitive options. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。