查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 不同動作型態被動反覆衝擊式訓練法效果訓練之研究=Effects of Passive Repeated Plyometric Training with Different Movement Types on Strength and Power |
---|---|
作者 | 張木山; 紀忠呈; 董俊男; Chang, Mu-san; Chi, Chung-cheng; Tung, Chun-nan; |
期刊 | 大專體育學刊 |
出版日期 | 20041000 |
卷期 | 6:3 2004.10[民93.10] |
頁次 | 頁133-143 |
分類號 | 528.915 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 不同動作型態; 衝擊式訓練; 訓練效果; Different motion types; Plyometric training; Training effects; |
中文摘要 | 本研究乃以衝擊式訓練理論為基礎,應用被動反覆衝擊式肌力訓練器為實驗工具,其目的皆在建構被動反覆衝擊式肌力訓練法在肌力、動力訓練土之最佳方法,同時比較分析在不同變頌中(不同動作頻率之訓練間;不同動作頻率與控量增速訓練),對肌力、動力訓練效果上的差異。乃以不同動作頻率(60RPM、120RPM)之訓練與控量增速(從30RPM→60RPM→90RPM→120RPM→150RPM逐漸遞增)訓練為變項,以國立花蓮師院體育學系26名男學生為對象,經八週每遇三次的訓練後,測驗所得資料,以SPSS for Windows 10.0版之軟體進行各項統計處理,同時以α=.05為顯著水準進行統計考驗,步聰為:以皮爾遜積差相關法求取信度係數;以獨立樣本單因子共變數分析,考驗各組內之同質性;以相依樣本t檢定,考驗各組內訓練前、後之效果。以獨立樣本單因子共變數分析,考驗各組問之差異顯著性,極分析討論後,獲得下列研究發現:一、各組訓練後之成績,皆比訓練前進步。二、訓練致果最佳的應屬於控量增速組,四項運動能力檢測皆達顯著差異(p<.01)。三、各組問訓練後之效果比較,除了立定三次跳,無顯著的差異之外。垂直跳、30公尺跑及負重半蹲1RM等項,有顯著的差異存在(p<.01)。四、提升速度有致之訓練方式,以120RPM訓練法為最佳。五、提升肌力有技之訓練方式,則以120RPM及控量增速等二項為最佳。六、能同時提升彈跳能力與肌力者為控量增速訓練法。 |
英文摘要 | This research is based on plyometric training theory. The experimental tool used was passive repeated plyometric machine. The purposes of this research were: to establish a theoretical basis for passive repeated plyometric training on strength and power; and to compare and analyze the effects of different variables (different training frequency, different motion frequency and load-control with increasing speed) on strength and power. It was hoped that the best training load could be determined. The first step was to use different motion frequency training (60 RPM, 120 RPM) and load-control with increasing speed 的om30RPM →60RPM→90 RPM→120 RPM→150 RPM increasing progressively). Twenty-six students of the Physical Education Department at Hualien Teachers College served as subjects. They participated in a training program three times a week for eight weeks. SPSS for Windows 10.0 version was used to process statistics and analysis of the data. Statistical testing was set at the α=.05 level of significance. The reliability correlation was obtained from the statistical method of K. Pearson's product-moment correlation; the one factor analysis of covariance of independent samples was used to test the homogeneity among groups; dependent samples were used to test the effects of pre and post training among groups. The results of the study were: 1. Every group progressed after training. 2. The group trained with load-control with increasing speed gained the best effect. 3. Four sports ability tests showed significant differences (p<.01): there were significant differences (p<.01) in vertical jump, 30-meter run, and squat IRM. 4. Among training methods, 120RPM can help promote speed most. 5. 120RPM, and load-control increasing speed are the two best methods for promoting strength. 6. The load-control increasing speed method helped both bounce jump ability and strength. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。