查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 臺灣民主發展的困境與挑戰
- 防衛性民主的典範變遷:從民主鞏固理論與臺、西、韓三國規範比較出發
- 民主鞏固或崩潰:臺灣與俄羅斯之觀察(1995~2005年)
- 臺灣民主化的回顧與前瞻
- 臺灣民主化分析--Rustow與Huntington模式的檢驗
- East Asia and Global Democratic Developments in a Comparative Perspective
- 臺灣民主化經驗與香港民主化進程
- 白衫軍運動與臺灣民主化的進程
- 南韓民主化過程之簡析--以Huntington民主化理論為分析觀點
- Political Democratization and Constitutional Reform in Taiwan
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 臺灣民主發展的困境與挑戰=The Predicament and Challenges of Taiwan's Democratic Development |
---|---|
作者 | 朱雲漢; | 書刊名 | 臺灣民主季刊 |
卷期 | 1:1 2004.03[民93.03] |
頁次 | 頁143-162 |
分類號 | 571.6 |
關鍵詞 | 民主化; 民主治理危機; 民主鞏固; 共識型民主; 臺灣; 第三波民主; Democratization; Crisis of democratic governance; Democratic consolidation; Consensual democracy; Taiwan; Third-wave democracies; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 今日台灣是以定期、自由而公平的選舉來決定政權誰屬。以衡量民主體制的基本尺度而言,少有人會質疑台灣不是民主。但在2000年總統大選之後,台灣就陷入嚴重的民主治理危機,甚至動搖了新興民主體制的正當性基礎。經驗證據顯示,政權輪替後,台灣民眾對於民主實際運作的滿意程度、民主體制內主要機構的信任度、以及對於民主體制優越性的信念,皆明顯下降。台灣能否走出此一困境,要看2004年3月總統大選及2004年年底立法院選舉是否能幫助台灣找回主流價值,重建民眾對民主的信心。台灣的民主前景最終有賴於政黨領袖們能建立行政與立法機關間,以及政黨間的制度化協商機制,並在政治菁英間培養出「共識型」的政治文化。 |
英文摘要 | Regular, free and fair elections determine nowadays who comes to power in Taiwan. So far as the basic criteria for a democracy are concerned, Taiwan today is undoubtedly a democratic state. However, ever since the presidential election of 2000, Taiwan has been entangled in a crisis of democratic governance that even shakes the legitimacy base of her new democratic regime. Empirical evidence shows that, after the DPP's takeover, people's satisfaction with the actual performance of Taiwan's democracy, their trust in the major institutions of democracy, and their faith in the superiority of such a regime, have all fallen noticeably in Taiwan. Whether or not Taiwan can come out of the predicament depends on the results of both the presidential election scheduled for March and the reelection of the Legislative Yuan at the end of 2004. But our hope lies eventually in the capability of party leaders to institutionalize the mechanism of dispute settlement between the executive and legislative branches as well as among political parties, and to cultivate the political culture of the "consensus model" among the political elite. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。