頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 防衛性民主的典範變遷:從民主鞏固理論與臺、西、韓三國規範比較出發=The Paradigm Shift of Militant Democracy: From Perspectives of Democratic Consolidation and a Comparison between Taiwan, Spain and Korea |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 江廷振; | 書刊名 | 國會月刊 |
卷期 | 43:8=508 2015.08[民104.08] |
頁次 | 頁35-66 |
分類號 | 571.6 |
關鍵詞 | 防衛性民主; 戰鬥民主; 典範變遷; 政黨解散; 民主鞏固; 第三波民主化; 臺灣; 西班牙; 韓國; Militant democracy; Paradigm shift; Dissolution of political parties; Democratic consolidation; Third wave of democratization; Taiwan; Spain; Korea; South Korea; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 有鑑於共產政權垮臺、冷戰終結與第三波民主化的趨勢,使得當代防衛性民主在各國有不同的演進與興起,本文試圖從民主鞏固理論出發,比較防衛性民主與民主鞏固理論間的關連,試圖得出防衛性民主典範變遷的成因,並且從臺灣、西班牙、韓國三國的法制面介紹、分析與比較,進一步對照此種變遷現象,並試圖深省臺灣防衛性民主的不足。研究結論認為,當代防衛性民主的各國運作情形,有轉向保障基本權利的趨勢,並且為了符合各國特殊的民主鞏固需求,而與各國自身的歷史、文化因素與政經環境脈絡有關。為了契合民主鞏固與防衛民主的需求,臺灣政黨解散制度施行以及應用上不符當今臺灣的現狀,應檢討改進。 |
英文摘要 | Due to the rises of the evolving concept of militant democracy, the dissolution of the Soviet Union, and the third wave of democratization in contemporary world, this article compares the theory of militant democracy and the theory of democratic consolidation, and aims to discover the causes and theoretical foundation of the paradigm shift of militant democracy. This article takes the legal mechanism of “new militant democracy” in three countries—Taiwan, Spain and Korea—as examples, and tries to find out whether the present militant legal mechanism works appropriately in Taiwan. This article concludes that the paradigm shift contains three factors: (a) the expansion of militant democracy norms to meet specific domestic consolidation needs of different countries; (b) the trends toward more protection of human rights; and (c) the accommodation with its local context of cultural, historical, political and economic conditions. Therefore, the requirements of dissolution of political parties, as specified in the Constitutional Amendment of the Republic of China (Taiwan), does not perfectly fit for Taiwan, and needs to be improved. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。