查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 兩岸《消保法》懲罰性賠償金制度之比較研究
- 中華人民共和國懲罰性賠償金制度之現狀與未來發展--從消保法過渡到民法典草案之考察
- 《消費者保護基金》--以懲罰性賠償金作為其經費來源的可行性研究
- 懲罰性賠償金責任成立的抗辯事由--從美國法制論臺灣規範上之缺失
- 不誠實廣告與懲罰性賠償金--最高法院101年度臺上字第122號判決評釋
- 醫療糾紛處理的過程與發展--以德國民法為中心
- 論產品責任近年來之學說與實務之發展--民法研討會第六十次研討會會議紀錄
- 受僱人執行職務之侵權行為與僱用人之消保法懲罰性賠償金責任--最高法院九七年度臺上字第二三一五號判決之研究
- 臺灣商品責任法之發展--以消費者保護法上之商品責任為中心
- 論消費者保護法上之服務責任--最高法院相關判決評釋
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 兩岸《消保法》懲罰性賠償金制度之比較研究=A Comparative Study of Punitive Damages between Mainland China and Taiwan's Consumer Laws |
---|---|
作 者 | 戴志傑; | 書刊名 | 臺北大學法學論叢 |
卷 期 | 53 2003.12[民92.12] |
頁 次 | 頁91-135 |
分類號 | 496.34 |
關鍵詞 | 消費者; 消費者保護法; 產品責任; 商品責任; 懲罰性賠償金; 補償性賠償; 契約; 合同; 侵權行為; 詐欺; Consumer; Consumer law; Product liability; Punitive damages; Exemplary damages; Compensatory damages; Contract; Tort; Fraud; Deception; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 懲罰性賠償金乃是在補償性賠償外,為懲罰被告具有惡意動機的不法行為以及為嚇阻被告或他人於未來從事類似之不法行為而所給予的賠償金。因此,懲罰性賠償金之目的乃在於懲罰被告之不法行為及嚇阻被告或他人再為相類似的錯誤行為。儘管懲罰性賠償金之法律制度存在著許多適當性之爭議,但因其亦具有一定公共政策之目的,故為美國普遍各州所接受而樂於妥善建立的制度。 由於科技的進步與經濟的發展使得現今社會消費者問題日益嚴重。因此,台灣與中國大陸分別於一九九三年制訂了「消費者保護法」以保護消費者之權利,並且於該法中引入了懲罰性賠償金的法律制度。是故,隨著兩岸交流日漸頻繁,實有必要對於彼此間關於懲罰性賠償金之法律制度作一比較研究。 |
英文摘要 | Punitive damages are damages, other than compensatory damages, awarded against a defendant to punish him for his outrageous conduct and to deter him and others like him from similar conduct in the future. Consequently, the purpose of punitive damages is to punish the defendant for his wrongdoing and to deter him and others from similar misconduct. Even if the legal system of punitive damages has a lot of argument in suitability, it is also provided with certain purpose of public policy, so that, yet, in widespread states in the United State of America, the acceptance of punitive damages is too popular and well established to be discarded. Consumer problem have become an issue that concerns modem legal systems due to the rapid development of scientific research and economic prosperity. For this reason, Taiwan and Mainland China separately drew up “Consumer Protection Law” in 1993, and to apply them as means for the protection of consumer rights, and the punitive damages system also adopted in these systems. Therefore, following the increasingly frequent exchange between the Taiwan and mainland China, a comparative study of punitive damages system in the two statutes has become more important. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。