查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- Different Perspectives of a University Choir Conductor and Singers
- 攜手課程的教與學
- 高職餐飲科導師領導風格、學習動機與學習成效之相關研究--以班級氣氛為干擾變項
- A Case Study on English Teachers' Self-Introductions Upon Meeting New Classes Using a Motivating Learning Activity
- 《禮記.學記篇》之教育哲學思想
- Achievement Motivation in Learning English:Ability Groups and Normal Groups Compared at the Military Academies
- 提昇學習動機的教師行為
- 專科生的英語學習動機及其對英語課程之需求分析
- ARCS動機設計模式在教學上之應用
- Cener Stage Communication--Oral Presentations as Motivational Activities
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | Different Perspectives of a University Choir Conductor and Singers=一所大學合唱團指揮與團員之不同觀點 |
---|---|
作者 | 劉英淑; | 書刊名 | 國教學報 |
卷期 | 15 2003.09[民92.09] |
頁次 | 頁131-148 |
分類號 | 913.3 |
關鍵詞 | 合唱教學; 教學技巧; 師生溝通; 領導風格; 學習動機; Choral teaching; Rehearsal technique; Communication; Leadership; Motivation; |
語文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 本研究以質性研究的方式,探討美國西南部一所大學的音樂系當中,一個合唱團指揮與團員之不同觀點。研究目的在探討合唱團指揮如何認定自己在團內扮演的角色?他的異象是什麼?指揮如何在例行的練唱時間向團員溝通他的理念?團員對指揮的理念和實際表現有何想法?團員如何認定自己在團中的角色?他們想要什麼?學習動機是什麼?研究者利用一個學期的時間,每週不定期到合唱團練唱的教室進行觀察記錄,並與指揮者及八位團員進行多次正式與非正式的訪談。 本研究從領導、教學風格與技巧、教學曲目以及期望等四個專業面向來探討指揮的觀點。這所大學的指揮認為作為一個領導者,必須有獨立自主的人格與堅持信念的決心。然而在教學的過程中,容許團員有民主的討論。指揮者要求表現的品質,卻容許練習的過程在鬆散的氛圍當中進行。指揮的教學頗為靈活,人聲示範、肢體動作、口語比喻均派上用場。他對於音樂的曲目選擇相當寬廣,對團員有很高的期許,期望他們成為「二十世紀音樂的代言人」。不僅如此,指揮者更期望合唱團的水準能凌駕他人之上,成為全國皆知的音樂團體。 從團員的觀點來看,指揮對合唱團的信念與教學風格,不盡然與指揮完全一致。他們認同指揮對團員應該有很高的期許與要求,但是卻無法完全理解指揮對團員的要求是什麼。團員感謝指揮教學時對學生給予的尊重與容忍,但他們更希望指揮的教學是有計畫的,是嚴謹的,而不是一盤散沙。多數團員偏好浪漫時期的曲目,但是他們卻也肯定二十世紀的音樂對音樂學習的價值。他們認為如果指揮引導他們對二十世紀的音樂有深入的認識,或許他們會改變想法轉而喜歡那一類的音樂。此外,合唱獎學金的議題亦為學生學習動機的影響因素。 本研究發現,師生溝通、學生歌唱技巧的差異、學習動機等是造成師生觀點不一致的重要因素。 |
英文摘要 | The purpose of this study was to investigate the different perspectives of a university choir conductor and the singers. What is the conductor's role in the choir? What is his vision for the group? How does the conductor communicate his goals with the singers through daily rehearsal? How do singers perceive the conductor and his role? How do singers perceive their own roles in a university choir? What do they expect? What do they need? What are their motivations? Multiple direct observations with written field notes were conducted in rehearsals of the choir during one semester. Formal and informal interviews were conducted with the conductor and singers in the choir. The conductor's perspectives were organized around his expertise in leadership, teaching style and rehearsal technique, repertoire and expectations. The conductor determined his role in the choir was an independent person with confidence in his goals for the choir. Although the conductor was insistent and demanding, he preferred running the rehearsals in a loose, non-stressful way with a great patience and an encouraging attitude. In rehearsing choral literature, the conductor's goal was to educate the singers to be flexible with their abilities to sing literature in a greater range of styles. Singers' perspectives did not always parallel the conductor's perspectives. They agree with the conductor's demanding attitude toward the choir, but do not comprehend the conductor's requirements. The singers appreciate the conductor's encouraging attitude during the teaching, but they prefer more structured rehearsals rather than rehearsing in a loose style. The singers prefer Romantic music better than the 20th century contemporary music, but still respect its value in musical learning. They think that they might like the repertoire better if the conductor helped them to know the music more. In addition, the scholarship issue brings up the motivations to learn. The findings showed that the teacher-student communications, singers' differences in singing technique, motivations, repertoire and scholarship were factors of causing the incongruity. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。