查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 海德格「存有與時間」的Dasein 是一個人本主義的概念(Humanistic Concept)嗎?
- Time, Being, and Language: Toward a Phenomenological Reading of Endgame and Waiting for Godot
- 現象學的觀念--從海德格的場所思維來看
- 海德格的「現象學方法概念」再探
- 現象學論死亡--以列維納斯為線索
- 海德格《存有與時間》與生命教育之哲學基礎初探--以本真性和非本真性存在為核心之探討
- 繪畫的現象性--以馬里翁現象學為核心的批判性考察
- 海德格的存有哲學及其對教育的蘊涵
- 創傷的記憶或遺忘?--一個時間現象學的探討
- 從對比情境到存有論美學--以晚期海德格的藝術觀為摹本
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 海德格「存有與時間」的Dasein 是一個人本主義的概念(Humanistic Concept)嗎?=Is the Concept of Dasein in Heidegger's Being and Time a Humanistic Concept? |
---|---|
作 者 | 陳榮華; | 書刊名 | 國立臺灣大學哲學論評 |
卷期 | 26 2003.03[民92.03] |
頁次 | 頁1-30 |
分類號 | 147.72 |
關鍵詞 | 海德格; 存有; 現象學; 人本主義; Heidegger; Being; Phenomenology; Humanism; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文要證明:海德格《存有與時間》中的Dasein不是一個人本主義的概念。我分三部份進行這個工作。首先,我根據〈柏拉圖的真理理論〉一文,說明人本主義的意涵,它是指:人在思考時,不以存有為基礎,而以人自己為基礎。然後,我分析《存有與時間》中的方法論和Dasein的存有,指出當海德格說明Dasein時,是以事實性為Dasein的基礎,因此,雖然《存有與時間》一書在分析Dasein時,是以Dasein為核心的,但並不因此是以Dasein為它自己的基礎。由此可以證實,Dasein不是一個人本主義的概念。最後我要指出,只有預設Dasein不是人本主義的概念,才能一致說明海德格後期哲學的發展,由此,我更進一步證成Dasein不是人本主義的概念。 |
英文摘要 | The aim of this essay is to show that Dasein in Heidegger's Being and Time is not a humanistic concept. In doing this I will separate my work into three section. In the first section I will probe the concept of humanism by an analysis on Heidegger's essay entitled "Plato's Doctrine of Truth." I will conclude that humanism, on Heidegger's view, is the claim that man, in his thinking, has forgotten being and presupposes himself as the ultimate ground. In the second section I will show, by an analysis on the methodology and the Being of Dasein Heidegger invokes in his Being and Time, that the ground of Dasein is not itself, but facticity- that is, something beyond Dasein. With these conclusions in mind, it will be reasonable to assert that Dasein is not a humanistic concept. In the last section I will indicate that only when we presuppose that Dasein is not a humanistic concept can we coherently explain the development of Heidegger's thought. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。