查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 「此有之為在世存有」中之辯證性張力:海德格「存有與時間」核心思想脈絡綜觀下之具體主體性初探
- 海德格「基本存有學」與哲學詮釋學之緣起:「存有與時間」思路對高達美哲思啟始之效應歷史
- 高達美哲學詮釋學之原理--理解之歷史性與詮釋學循環
- 歷史、歷史意識與實效歷史--論高達美哲學詮釋學中「歷史性」概念之演變
- 哲學詮釋學(1):早期海德格,以及施萊爾瑪赫和狄爾泰的初步回顧
- 高達美詮譯學與黑格爾辯證法--綜論高達美哲學詮釋學生成史中之黑格爾思想
- Some Thoughts on Two Early Qing Readings of the Great Learning (Da Xue) in Light of Gadamerian Hermeneutics
- 理解的歷史性--朱熹論揚雄
- 「離合」在青少年發展歷程的意義
- 駱以軍的第四人稱單數書寫(2)--時間製圖學
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 「此有之為在世存有」中之辯證性張力:海德格「存有與時間」核心思想脈絡綜觀下之具體主體性初探=The Dialectical Tension in Dasein as In-der-Welt-sein: A Primary Research to Concrete Subjectivity under a Compendium of the Context of Core-Thinking in Heidegger's Being and Time |
---|---|
作 者 | 陸敬忠; | 書刊名 | 中原學報 |
卷 期 | 30:4 2002.12[民91.12] |
頁 次 | 頁531-550 |
分類號 | 147.72 |
關鍵詞 | 此有; 在世存有; 理解; 情境性; 存在性; 事實性; 憂心; 憂懼; 死亡; 時間性; 未來性; 歷史性; 基本存有學; 辯證性; 具體性主體; Dasein; In-der-Welt-sein; Understanding; State of mind; Existentiality; Facticity; Care; Anxiety; Death; Temporality; Futurity; Historicality; Fundamental ontology; Dialectical; Concrete subjectivity; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 海德格哲思可謂二十一世紀思潮的世界奇蹟,世界對其之理解尚未通貴,其對世界之影響則仍無法探底。本文之主旨在於'在海德格哲思主I哲學詮釋學之故應歷史底背景對所謂早期海德格之經典巨著〈存看興時間〉進行」嶄新問題視域F之理解: <存有興時間〉中對此有之為在世存有之基本存有式解析是再具有一種具體主體性理論之意涵?吾人之見解是:海德格之基本存有學底此有論不但有具體主體性之種子思想,而且此使其原欲化解坦克傳統主客體」元對LL關係架構而構思之在世存有某源性存有構成架構內形成另類辯證性關係之結構。而高達美之哲學詮釋早若要攝納海德格之詮釋學種子思想,就必須避免此種結構所帶來之可能的與實際的風險。 為闡論t述論點司本文對〈存者興哼周〉本身之基本內i函結構進行綜觀式論述,並且以綜理此有之為在世存有之基本存有學式解析底核心思想主線及其中隱含之辯證性張力關係之結構為經,以揭露其中具體主體性之純子思想為緯O首先揭示〈存看興時間〉之哲思底理論出發點,按著點明其論述L之方法一詮釋學性現象學。然後進入其主要內容性義理之主題性概觀。對在世存有之現象學式描述中探索「世界J(Welt)與「在存有」(In-Sein)是否已暗存辯證性張力關係之基源C對「在-存有」之存在性構造解析中,特別對與哲學詮釋學理論密切有關之部分,亦即第二十二節(理解與詮解>< Verstehen und Aus1gen)進行其在基本存有學脈絡中系統定位之精要探討。在對「憂懼」之為基本情境 性底解析中揭示此有之為具體性主體之原型C布「憂心」之為此有之存有底基本結構及其整體性中「存任性」已成為此書思路上線而對「死亡」之探討更以「存在性」為重心O最後在「時間性」之為此有之基層結構的解析中「未來|生」相對於「歷史性」之優位再次呈顯此有之具體主體性理論色彩。在開放性結論中本文提示基於本文研究成果而後續發展對於高達美哲學詮釋學對於海德格基本存訂學攝納之研究可能性 |
英文摘要 | The philosophizing of Martin Heidegger could be named as a world-wonder in the intellectual trend of the twentieth century. The World did not yet comprehend it (or him!)throuεhly, and its influence to the world is impossible to estimate yet. The motive of this essay is under the background of the effect-history of Heidegger's Thinking for the philosophical hermeneutics to understand the classic of early Heidegger - Being and Time and in fact under a new question-horizon: is there a kind of sense of concrete subctivity in the fundamental-ontological analysis of the Dasein as In-der-Welt-sein? The understanding of the author is: the theory of Dasein in Heidegger's fundamental ontology not only comprises theinitiative of concrete subjectivity‘but also because of that it implies a structure of dialectical tension in the original conception of In-der- Welt-sein as a new ontological framework of the primordial constitution of Being that shall overcome the problem-complex from the traditional epistemological framework of polar-opposite subject-object-relation. Gadamer's philosophical hermeneutics have to avoid the probable und actual risks from that kind of tensionstructure if he wants to adopt Heidegger's hermeneutic concept, which also lies within the Theory of Dasein as In-der- Welt-sein. For the Exposition of this new point of view for the comprehension of Being alld Time, this essay gives a overview of the fundamental content-structure of Being and Time. On the one hand il summarizes the theme of the core-thinking in the analysis of Dasein as In-der- Welt-sein and the implied structure of dialectical tension-relation. On the other hand it reveals the initiative of conιrete subjectivity in the core-thinking. At first the philosophical starting-point of the Being and Time and the method of it shall bc pointed out. Then it comes to the topical compendium of the systematical matter. In the phenomenological de-seriptionof ln-der- Welt-sein shall be searched if the origin of the dialectical tension is already implied in the relation Welt (World) and the ln-sein (Being-inl. ln the analysis of existentiale constitution of ln-sein the part which owns an initial relation with the philosophical herrneneutics, i.e. paragraph 32 "Underst(/nding and Interpretation", shall be interpreted regarding to its systematical position in the fundamental-ontological context. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。