查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- Some Thoughts on Two Early Qing Readings of the Great Learning (Da Xue) in Light of Gadamerian Hermeneutics
- 韓儒田艮齋之心性論
- 雲林、澎湖地區土壤沖蝕性及流失量之推估
- Feeding Rhythm of Thornfish, Terapon Jarbua
- The Study of Fishing Efficiencies of Optimal Mesh on 56 mm
- A Study of the Tree and Wood Characteristics of Young Pedigreed Jack Pine
- 苜蓿粉與大麥麩糠為主要日糧纖維來源對生長鵝生長性狀、腸道醱酵與纖維素酶活性之影響
- 改進離散系統強健穩定性及電腦模擬分析之研究
- 慢性阻塞性肺疾病人右心室閃爍造影研究
- 有機溶劑採樣中相對溼度對活性碳吸附管之影響
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | Some Thoughts on Two Early Qing Readings of the Great Learning (Da Xue) in Light of Gadamerian Hermeneutics=以高達美詮釋學觀點論兩篇有關《大學》的詮釋作品 |
---|---|
作 者 | 伍安祖; | 書刊名 | 臺大文史哲學報 |
卷 期 | 53 民89.11 |
頁 次 | 頁33-67 |
專 輯 | 中國傳統經典詮釋專號 |
分類號 | 097.3 |
關鍵詞 | 視域的融合; 詮釋循環; 歷史的特殊存在性; 後設實踐; 先期理解; 性; Fusion of horizons; Hermeneutic circle; Historical situatedness; Metapraxis; Preunderstanding; Xing; Nature; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 本文主要討論兩個相關主題。第一、藉著檢視陳確(1604-77)和李光地(1642-1718)兩人詮釋《大學》的文章,揭出儒家傳統詮釋學根本上是一種道德哲學。一般而言,經典的詮釋往往是為了表達對社會規範、社會價值以及其他人類學相關問題的看法,而將道德哲學嵌入詮釋學中,表示這樣的詮釋學基本的動機並非要建構或應用認知的理論,而在於追求並確認真理的存在。 其次,本文還說明儒家詮釋經典時,就如同其他的閱讀行為一樣,都受制於詮釋律令的威權之下,亦即遵循著那所謂不言自明的原則,認為所有的思想都涉及了詮釋,都和當下特定的歷史因素-特別是詮釋者的先期理解有關。再者,由於在詮釋和閱讀行為中會創造出一種文本與讀者間的對話,而在這樣的關係中,理解是一個必要的因素,因此儒家詮釋學的本質極適合與當代的理論,特別是高達美的詮釋學理論參照來思考。本文主張,終究高達美說明了西方哲學傳統,傾向將現實的處理化約為對一種分析方法/理論的追尋,而儒學相對的在意圖及實質上都是後設實踐的(metapractical),對現實此一整體做本體論式的處理時,大體而言是哲學性的。 |
英文摘要 | This essay has two related contentions. First, by examining two early Qing exegetical works on the Great Learning, one by Chen Que (陳確 1604-77) and another by Li Guangdi (李光地 1642-1718), the essay reveals that Confucian hermeneutics was essentially moral philosophy. Exegesis of the classics was an occasion for speculative thinking on the normative, the axiological, and the anthropological. The embedding of moral philosophy in hermeneutics meant that it was animated by the search for and affirmation of truths, rather than by the construction and application of theories of understanding. Second, it argues that Confucian engagement with the classics, as with all acts of reading, is subject to the tyranny of the hermeneutic imperative, the self-evident priciple that all thoughts involve interpretation and are relative to the contingent context of particular historical forces and factors, especially the interpreter's preunderstanding. To the extent that the acts of reading and interpreting inexorably forge a dialogical relation between the text and the reader, and since understanding is a universal element in this relation, the nature of Confucian hermeneutics may be fruitfully and comparatively pondered with reference to some contemporary theories, Gandamer's in particular. This essay contends that in the final analysis, Gadamerian hermeneutics exemplifies the Western philosophical predilection to reduce engagement with reality to the search for an analytical method/theory, whereas the Confucian counterpart is metapractical in intent and substance, broadly philosophical for its ontological confrontation with reality as an integrated whole. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。