頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 模糊統計分類及其在茶葉品質評定的應用=Fuzzy Statistical Cluster Analysis and its Application in Tea Quality |
---|---|
作 者 | 陳國任; 林雅慧; 吳柏林; 謝邦昌; | 書刊名 | 臺灣茶業研究彙報 |
卷 期 | 17 1998.06[民87.06] |
頁 次 | 頁19-37 |
分類號 | 434.815 |
關鍵詞 | 集群分析; 隸屬度函數; 模糊評鑑表; 模糊權重; Cluster analysis; Membership function; Fuzzy judgement table; Fuzzy weight; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本試驗將 69 個茶樹品種以四種群落分析法,依其形狀、色澤、水色及香味等評 鑑項目分為五等級,採用的方法為模糊分類法及加權模糊分類法,比較結果摘要如下: 白毛猴茶種因其製茶品質優良,不論任何分類法,春、夏、秋季皆屬第一級。經模糊分 類後,臺灣四大品種中青心烏龍及青心大冇在春季歸類於第一級,大葉烏龍及硬枝紅心歸類 於第三級;而經加權模糊分類後,香味品質有平均表現的之大葉烏龍種則歸類提高至第二級 。鐵觀音春夏茶屬第一級及秋茶屬第三級,經加權模糊分類後提升至第一級及二級。模糊分 類後青心烏龍、紅心烏龍、白心烏龍及大葉烏龍秋茶皆屬第一級。而竹葉系之小葉竹葉及竹 葉種,其全年製茶品質同屬第四級。適製紅茶之阿薩姆等品種,製茶品質較差,而歸類至第 四及第五級。 |
英文摘要 | The objective of this research was to classify 69 tea varieties into five clusters with fuzzy cluster analysis by five criteria for judging tea quality: shape, color, liquor color, flavour and taste. The result is summarized as following: The result revealed that Paimaohu was the best one among the 69 varieties in any reason. The four famous tea varieties of Taiwan, such as Chinshin Oolong and Chinshin Dapang, Dayeh Oolong, Hongshin Oolong and Yingjy Hongshin belonged to the first and third class in spring season respectively. After weighted fuzzy cluster analysis, Dayeh Oolong could be promted to the second class. By the fozzy cluster analysis, Chinshin Oolong, Hongshin Oolong, Peishin Oolong and Dayeh Oolong belonged to the first class in fall season. Tei-K wang-In belonged to second class in spring and summer season and third class in fall season respectively. Hsiaoyeh Tzuyeh and Tzuyeh belonged to fourth class around the year. Due to worse quality of liquor color and tasting, Assam and other varieties that suited to manufacturing black tea were the fifth class. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。