查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 中國哲學史書寫方法論=Methodology for Writing the History of Chinese Philosophy |
---|---|
作 者 | 歐崇敬; | 書刊名 | 東吳哲學學報 |
卷 期 | 6 2001.04[民90.04] |
頁 次 | 頁119-149 |
分類號 | 120.9 |
關鍵詞 | 創造轉化; 方法論; 中國哲學史; 史觀; 知識型; 典範; Creative and transformation methods; Methodology; History of Chinese philosophy; Historical perspectives; Knowledge types; Paradigm; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 中國哲學史的寫作自20世紀初期起,至今已有近百年的歷史,出版的專業〝中國哲學史〞或〝中國思想史〞、〝中國哲學發展史〞、〝中國哲學思想史〞等類型之作品已逾三十種以上。 在約三十種左右的中國哲學史相關作品中對於中國古代典籍的討論分析及選取都尚有許多值得反省、檢討或修正之處。而寫作者也經常在尚未完成全幅的古典哲學資料閱讀的情況下就進行哲學史的寫作,甚至是否定了許多具有豐富內容的哲學內涵。 然而,中國哲學界若要有所突破,就應該重新檢討一切古典典籍的論釋方法與選取判別方式,在發現新的哲學內容後,以創新轉化的哲學敘述方式為世界哲學增加新的生命力。 |
英文摘要 | The writing of the History of Chinese Philosophy can be traced back for almost a hundred years, to the begining of the 20th century. Over 30 professional publications carrying titles related to “The History of Chinese Philosophy”, “The History of Chinese Thought”,“The Development of Chinese Philosophy”, “The History of Chinese Philosophy and Thought” have been found. However, among the 30 or so publications related to the History of Chinese Philosophy, there remain areas of improvement in the selection, discussion and analysis or ancient Chinese classics. It is also apparent that the authors of such publications have not completed reading all the texts under review before staring their own writing. Regretfully, these authors have also rejected the rich philosophical underpinnings in these works. To seek a breakthrough in this field, we will need to review the methods in which we select and interpret these classics. Upon the discovery of new philosophical content in these classics, we can adopt creative and transformation philosophical description methods to enrich the world of philosophy. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。