頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 孫中山與馬克思科學觀之比較研究=The Comparative Study of Scientific Perspective between Sun Yat-sen and Karl Marx |
---|---|
作 者 | 林賢治; | 書刊名 | 逢甲人文社會學報 |
卷 期 | 1 2000.11[民89.11] |
頁 次 | 頁271-292 |
分類號 | 005.183、005.183 |
關鍵詞 | 科學觀; 進化論; 知難行易; 知識論; 辯證法; 歷史觀; Scientific perspective; Evolutionism; Knowledge is difficult, but action is easy; Epistemology; Dialectics; Historical perspective; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 孫中山與馬克思科學觀之比較研究是三民主義和共產主義比較研究的基礎工作。本文首先探討孫中山的科學觀,從「科學觀形成之探源」、「科學作為一種方法論」、「科學的進化論」和「知難行易的科學知識論」等四個方面來分析孫中山的科學觀。其次,再從「科學和空想的對立」、「辯證法作為一種方法論」和「歷史唯物主義作為科學的歷史觀」等三個方面來探究馬克思的科學觀。最後,以「關於科學的意義」、「關於科學作為方法論」、「關於科學觀的哲學基礎」、「關於知識論」和「關於人類世界的進化和前景」等五個主題來比較研究孫中山與馬克思的科學觀。 本文除了比較研究孫中山與馬克思科學觀之異同和特別點外,作者在結論裡,更進一步比較分析兩者之基本背景,以便更能了解兩者科學觀差異之所在,同時也更能體會兩者在「人和自然的關係」、「唯心和唯物的關係」以及「歷史進化的動力」等方面,馬克思的論點是有其不足和偏頗之處;相反的,孫中山的立論是較為周延和深刻的。 |
英文摘要 | The comparative study of scientific perspective between Sun Yat-sen and Karl Marx is the foundation course of the comparative study between Three Peoples’ Doctrines and communism. Firstly, the author explores the scientific perspective of Sun Yat-sen from four aspects of “The Origin of Scientific Perspective”, “Science As A Methodology”, “Scientific Evolutionism” and “Scientific Epistemology of ‘Knowledge is Difficult, but Action is Easy’”. Secondly, the author explores the scientific perspective of Karl Marx from three aspects of “Scientific Socialism and Utopian Socialism Are Opposites”, “Dialectics As A Methodology” and “Historical Materialism As A Scientific Historical Perspective”. Lastly, the author compares the two scientific perspective from five topics of “Meaning of Science”, “Science As A Methodology”, “Philosophical Foundation of Scientific Perspective”, “Epistemology” and “Evolution and Future of Human World”. In addition to compare the two scientific perspectives, in conclusion, the author also compares the background of Sun Yat-sen and Karl Marx, in order to further understand the differences of the two scientific perspectives. Moreover, on the topics of “Relation between Human and Nature”, “Relation between Idealism and Materialism” and “Force of Historical Evolution”, Marx’s thought is poor, on the contrary, Sun Yat-sen’s thought is correct and complete. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。