查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 從辯證到文本:論卡爾.巴特與後現代神/學
- Writing off the Boundaries of the New Novel: A Note on Robbe-Grillet's Writing Theories
- 從文本到「文字書寫」--德希達對書寫的解構理論研究(1)
- 從文本到「文字書寫」--德希達對書寫的解構理論研究(2)
- 意義的挑釁--德希達與保羅.德曼的解構主義及其在當代社會的文化解釋探究
- 從文本到「文字書寫」--德希達對書寫的解構理論研究(3)
- 從文本到「文字書寫」--德希達對書寫的解構理論研究(5)
- Racism and Its Textuality: A Deconstructionist Debate
- 從文本到「文字書寫」--德希達對書寫的解構理論研究(4)
- 「文本」與「真實」的概念--試論德希達對傳統史學的沖擊
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 從辯證到文本:論卡爾.巴特與後現代神/學=From Dialectics to Text: Karl Barth and Postmodern Theo/logy |
---|---|
作 者 | 曾慶豹; | 書刊名 | 中原學報 |
卷 期 | 28:4 2000.12[民89.12] |
頁 次 | 頁91-101 |
分類號 | 242 |
關鍵詞 | 巴特; 德希達; 上帝之言; 文本; 見證; Karl Barth; Derrida; Word of God; Text; Witness; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 後現代思想以德希達的解構最真代表,巴特的神學則被漠斯﹒昆稱為後現代神學的發端,問題是: 巴特與後現代神學的實質內容是什麼?在什麼意義上,巴特與德希達的思想是接近的呢?本文分別從兩方面來分析巴特神學的後現代取向:啟示與恩典的辯證與上帝之言的文本性。 神學根據於上帝之言,根據於啟示與恩典的辯證,巴特藉此反對自由神學,反對任何一種「直接」談論上帝的方式。啟示與恩典即是一種非直接性、非客觀談論上帝的方式,它同時也意昧著一種人與上帝之間的「危機」所以,辯證神學的確切意涵即是﹒中止任何的方法o換言之,上帝與任何穩定的中心、本質、存有、自因無闕,尤其在「三一論」語式中的上帝,更是對形上學意義的「上帝中心的克服」。 上帝之言的文本性即在於上帝具有自由的性質,人以任何一種人為的方式接近上帝之言都不免受到限制,因此人們回答祂的方式只能是「信仰」的。德希達所說的「文本以外無一物」可以說明聖經文本的權威性,上帝的啟示展示著一種無止盡的書寫,巴特則以「見證」方式說明人接近上帝永遠處在不確定的基礎之上。 |
英文摘要 | Postmodem thought is best represented by Jacques Derrida's deconstructions, and the theology ofKarl Barth was known to Hans Küng as the beginning of postmodem theology. Our question remains that:‘What is the essence of Barth's and postmodem theology?,'‘On what basis, Barth and Derrida's thoughts are family resemblance?' This essay will analyse in two aspects on the postmodem tendency in Barth' theology: the Dialectic of revelation and grace, and the Textuality of the Word of God. Theology based on the Word of God, as on the dialectic of revelation and grace, Barth reject any ways of ‘directly'discourse on God. Revelation and grace is in itself a nondirect, non-objective forrn of discourse about God, this also at the same time implied a kind of 'crisis' between God and humankind, therefore, Dialectic Theology is the theology of termination of all methods. In other words, especially in the context of 'trinitarity' of the Word of God, God has nothing to do with any metaphysicalmeanine of ‘Centric',‘substance',‘Being',‘Reason'etc .. The Textuality of the Word of God implies the nature of divine freedom, thus humankind's response to God can only by ‘faith'(sola fides). Derrida's idea of ιthere is nothing outside of the text' is an explanation on the authority of the text of the Bible, the revelation of God discloses a kind of unendless writings, Barth, in the form of ‘witness',describes the approaching of humankind to God shaU forever be based on the foundation of uncertainty, it is inevitable their approach to the Word of God in grace (sola gratia). |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。