查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 認知/意動成份二階驗證性因素分析模式之適配性研究
- 國中生認知/意動成份與學習表現之相關研究
- 皮亞傑認知發展論探討自我調整學習歷程之建構與應用
- Eighth Grade Chinese Students' Self-Reported Strategy Use and Metacognitive Awareness after Reading Stories in English
- 從認知心理與社會互動談兒童語言發展--從皮亞傑與維高斯基理論談兒童英語學習
- 也談心像教學--以唐詩「漁歌子」之教學為例
- 內在動機與情意學習方案之發展及其班級式團體輔導效果
- 中學生自我調整學習量表之建構及其信效度研究
- 動機、目標設定、行動控制、學習策略之關係:自我調整學習歷程模式之建構及驗證
- 英文閱讀教學評量研究--以國防大學中正理工學院九十一年班為例
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 國中生認知/意動成份與學習表現之相關研究=Relationship among Junior High School Students' Cognitive/Conative Components and Learning Performance |
---|---|
作者 | 程炳林; Cherng, Biing-lin; |
期刊 | 師大學報. 教育類 |
出版日期 | 20000400 |
卷期 | 45:1 2000.04[民89.04] |
頁次 | 頁43-59 |
分類號 | 521.12 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 認知; 意動; 先前知識; 學習策略; 動機導向; 行動控制; Cognition; Conation; Prior knowledge; Learning strategies; Motivativonal orientation; Action control; |
中文摘要 | 本研究的目的如下:(1)瞭解四個認知成份變項與四個意動成份變項之關係。 (2)探討八個認知╱意動成份變項對國中學習表現的預測力。(3)探討認知╱意動成份是 否能將受試者區分成明顯的集群。 受試者來自八所國中共687人,他們接受閱讀理解測驗(丙式)、策略覺察量表,學習 策略量表、情意反應量表、學習動機量表、行動導向量表、行動控制策略量表之施測。研究 發現如下:(1)認知成份四個變項與意動成份四個變項彼此可以互相解釋大約56%左右的 變異量。意動成份對訊息處理策略和後設認知策略的解釋力比較高,認知成份對學習動機和 行動控制策略的解釋力比較高。(2)認知╱意動成份八個變項可以聯合解釋國中生學習表 現總變異量的54%,其中內容知識是學習表現最有力的預測變項。(3)認知╱意動成份四 個因素可以將全體受試者區分成三個特性明顯的集群。 |
英文摘要 | The purposes of this study were: (1) to explore the relationship among students' cognitive and conation variables, (2) to explore the effect of cognitive/conation variables on students' learning performance, and (3) to group observations into clusters by cognitive/conation components. Participants were 687 students from eight junior high schools. The instruments employed in these studies included: Reading Comprehension Tests (from C), Index of Reading Strategies Awareness, Learning Strategies Inventory, Affective Response Inventory, Learning Motivation Inventory, Action Orientation Inventory, and Action Control Strategies Inventory. The results of this study were as follow: (1) There were significant canonical correlation between cognitive components and conation components. The redundancy indices were 29.75% and 26.44%. (2) There were significant multiple correlation between cognitive/ conation variables and learning performance. The cognitive/conation variables explained about 54% of the overall variance of learning performance. (3) The cluster analysis showed that subjects could be grouped into three clusters by cognitive/conation components. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。