查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 景觀型態對肌電值及注意力恢復能力之研究
- 造園設計中植栽色彩對觀賞者效益之研究
- 太空劇場影片中景觀元素對觀眾生心理反應之研究
- 鄉村與都市景觀對心理反應影響之研究
- Bladder-Sphincter Biofeedback as Treatment of Detrusor Instability in Women Who Failed to Respond to Oxybutynin
- 以腦電波探討具恢復力之環境對生心理影響之研究
- 防風通聖散與大腸生理迴饋對慢性便秘患者之臨床研究
- Treatment of Idiopathic Anal Incontinence: Combined Transanal Electrostimulation and Biofeedback Therapy
- 書寫時握筆姿勢對手臂肌電值之影響
- 音樂治療概觀
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 景觀型態對肌電值及注意力恢復能力之研究=The Influences of Landscape Types on the Electromyographic and Attention Restoration |
---|---|
作者 | 張俊彥; 萬麗玲; | 書刊名 | 造園學報 |
卷期 | 7:1 2000.08[民89.08] |
頁次 | 頁1-22 |
分類號 | 435.7 |
關鍵詞 | 心理生理學; 生理迴饋; 肌電值; 注意力恢復能力; Psychophysiological; Biofeedback; Electromyographic; Attention restoration; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究以認知模式(Cognitive Paradigm)理論為概念,運用心理生理學(Psychophysiological)的測量方式,探討不同景觀型態之刺激源,對於注意力恢復能力(Attention Restoration)與生理指標肌電值(Electromyographic, EMG)間的相關性,以期對於未來在景觀評估的研究上能夠尋求一個明確而有效益的指標。 經驗證分析結果顯示,受測者對不同的城鄉景觀在“注意力恢復能力”的心理感受程度上,以對自然景觀為最高,農村景觀次之,而都市日常生活空間為最低。此與Kaplan (Kaplan and Kaplan, 1989; Kaplan, 1995)等人及Herzog等人(Herzog et al., 1997)的研究均有一致性的論證結果,顯示自我評估式的問卷調查可為一有效的測量評估工具。 在生理指標—肌電反應上,對於不同城鄉景觀型態環境之刺激結果並無顯著差異,而在心理感受程度與生理反應之間相關性亦未達顯著水準。在個人特質的影響上,則不因個人特質的加入而影響不同景觀型態刺激對心理感受程度與生理指標—肌電反應之結果。 |
英文摘要 | The Influences of Landscape Types on the Physical and Psychological Reaction: A Study on the Electromyographic and Attention Restoration This study uses the cognitive paradigm as the conceptual theory bases. It also applies the Psychophysiological measurement to depict the relationships between Attention Restoration and the Electromyographic. Earlier studies have shown that different landscape types will induce different psychological responses through the visual perception. However, few studies discussed the relationships between landscape types and repondents’ physical response. Therefore, the purposes of this study were: 1) To investigate psychological reponses to different urban-rural landscapes. 2) To investigate physical responses to different urban-rural landscapes. 3) To investigate the relationships between psychologicla and physical response to different urbanrural landscapes. The result of the experiment shows that the natural landscape has the highest Attention Restoration Score, followed by rural landscape, and the urban landscape has the lowest score. This result is consistent with the findings of Kaplan (Kaplan and Kaplan, 1989; Kaplan, 1995) and Herzog (Herzog et al., 1997). The self-evaluate questionnaire was tested and proved to be a valid tool for measuring respondents’ attention restoration ability. The physical indicator, the Electromyographic (EMG), shows no statistically significant differences between different urban-rural landscapes. The relationship between psychological and physical response to different urban-rural landscapes can tnot pass the statistical significant test either. Personal characteristics have no influential effects both on the relationship between landscape types and psychological response and the relationships between landscape types and physical response. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。