查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 陳那的三性思想--在「佛母般若波羅蜜多圓集要義論」中的理解
- 玄奘所傳「依他起唯雜染」之探討
- 「攝大乘論」的依他起性初探
- 護法在「成唯識論」的立場之研究
- Bhāvaviveka's Syllogism as an Initial Step to Enlightenment
- 「轉依」理論探析--以《成唯識論》及窺基《成唯識論述記》為中心
- 《大乘莊嚴經論》漢譯作「相」的Lakṣaṇa和Nimitta的研究--以三性說和幻喻為中心
- 清辨論證方式之檢視--以《般若燈論.觀緣品》與《掌珍論》為線索
- 《大乘莊嚴經論.求法品》安慧疏對幻喻和三性的詮釋--以〈求法真實義〉(kk.13-14)與〈求真實幻喻〉(kk.15-29)為中心
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 陳那的三性思想--在「佛母般若波羅蜜多圓集要義論」中的理解=Dinnaga's Thought of Three Natures: The Understanding in his Prajnaparamita-pindarthasamgraha |
---|---|
作 者 | 陳宗元; | 書刊名 | 中華佛學學報 |
卷 期 | 13(上) 民89.05 |
頁 次 | 頁123-136 |
分類號 | 222.13 |
關鍵詞 | 依他起性; 幻喻; 對治的三性; 相見二分; 現量自證說; Paratantralaksana; The simile of phantom; The three natures of treatment; The mental eject and the consciousness; The theory of self realization by experience; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 依護法在《成唯識論》卷3所引用的陳那《集量論》中的一偈說:「似 境相所量,能取相自證,即能量及果,此三體無別」。此偈為陳那三分說的重要 根據,但須注意的是「此三體無別」。又繼承他思想的法稱也在注釋《集量論》 的《量評論》中說:「以分化為特相的所取、能取形相的惑亂」 (vibhaktalak.sa.na-graahyagrahakaakaaraviplavaa),能取、所取的二分是�[計所 執,是如毛髮一樣的錯誤,非是真實的存在。如此看來,陳那是一分說非是三分 說、陳那為有相唯識學派的說法、勢必修正。可是,當吾人檢視陳那在《佛母般 若波羅蜜多圓集要義論》中對於唯識三性的解釋時,偏重於對治說。發現陳那以 �[計所執性來說明二取,無二取之智即是圓成實性;以帝網、乾闥婆城等幻喻來 形容依他起性,並且說:「此依他者,即無明自體」(《大正藏》冊25,p.908c), 即依無明自體(=心識)所生起的是依他起,並非是如同毛髮等�[計所執性的錯 覺。 此外,陳那在《佛母般若波羅蜜多圓集要義論》中說,為對治十種分別散亂 而說三性,故三性在陳那的理解中,不同於世親對於三性的統一說、實踐說。以 對治的立場來看,依他起性的有無問題,顯然並不十分重要。重要的是離有無而 悟中道。依妄識之生起、而知一切空無自性。現證心外無法時,卻是因果宛然有 業有報。若是能如佛現量自證,則說空說有無非方便,此方是唯識回歸般若之深 義。若論其陳那(己破外境實有)的心識說是一分說或三分說,心識中之相有或 無、端視其立場而定。依心識有自我顯現功能而言,則是三分說,若是唯一識體 虛妄成三分非真實而言,則是一分說。因此,與其爭論陳那是一分說或三分說, 不如強調他是「現量自證說」或者是「空性說」來的自然些。 |
英文摘要 | Dinnaaga was usually regarded as the promoter of the so-called three natures─parikalpitalak.sa.na, paratantralak.sa.na and parini.spannala-k.sa.na. However, according to praj~n?p?ramit?pi.n.d?rsajgraha, Dinnaaga used the theory of three natures to deal with the ten kinds of discriminative and wandering mind. Therefore, he was not the promoter of three natures. It is not important whether there is paratantralaksana or not. The important thing is to be free from havingness or nothingness in order to realize the middle way. From the arising of delusive consciousness, one understanding that everything is empty and without self-nature. When one experiences that everything is nothing but the function of consciousness, one will realize that there is the law of cause and effect, i.e. karma and retribution. If one can experience the reality as the Buddha did, it is only a skillful means when one speaks of nothingness or havingness. This is the profound meaning of Vijbana matra theory to return to prajba. Dinnaga mentioned three natures when he spoke of the function of the self manifestation of consciousness. But he mentioned only one consciousness when he spoke of the delusiveness of the three natures of consciousness. Therefore, it is meaningless to argue the standpoint of Dinnaga; it is better to emphasize that he advocated theory of self realization by experience or emptiness. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。