查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- Reliability of Body Fat Measurement : Skindfold, Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis and Infrared
- 小兒麻痺患者身體型態暨身體組成研究測量
- 肥胖婦女減重前後體組成及熱量代謝之變化
- Comparison of the Metabolic Effects of All-in-One and Conventional Total Parenteral Nutrition Infusions in Rats
- 臺中地區國民健康體能檢測與分析
- 水中稱重法測量人類組成之探討
- 持續性及循環性全靜脈營養方式對大白鼠身體組成及肝臟功能的改變
- The Relationship between Weekly Physical Activity and Body Composition of New Orleans of Students
- 有氧舞蹈及水中有氧學習課程對專科高年級女生健康適能及身體組成之比較
- 皮脂肪預測公式相關研究
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | Reliability of Body Fat Measurement : Skindfold, Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis and Infrared=三種體脂肪測量之信度研究 : 以皮脂厚度測量計、生物電子阻抗儀及近紅外線分析儀 |
---|---|
作 者 | 曹政琪; 林光華; 賴金鑫; 藍青; | 書刊名 | 中華民國物理治療學會雜誌 |
卷 期 | 20:2 1995.09[民84.09] |
頁 次 | 頁102-109 |
分類號 | 418.996 |
關鍵詞 | 體組成; 生物電子阻抗儀; 近紅外線分析儀; 皮脂厚度測量計; Body composition; Bioelectrical impedance analysis; Near-infrared interactance; Skinfold caliper; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 本實驗的目的是探討測量體組成(Bodycomposition)及身體脂肪百分比 (percent bodyfat;fat)的三種測量方法:用生物電子阻抗儀(bioelectrical impedance analysis;BIA),近紅外線分析儀(near-in仟area interactance;IF),以及皮脂厚度測量計 (skinfold caliper;SF)在測試者本身(intrarater)和測試者彼此之間(interrater)的測試信 度。受試者為20位正常體重青年人,男女各半(其平均年齡23±2歲;平均體重60 ±9公斤);分別接受這三種方法測量體脂肪之百分比。每位受試者均由二位物理治 療師分別用這三種方法重覆地做二次測試;在兩次測試之間有20分鐘的間隔。做 生物電子阻抗分析時,受試者採平躺的姿勢接受測試。做紅外線測量時,受試者 則採坐姿,由二頭肌的中點附近讀取脂肪百分比之數值。另外,在測量皮脂厚度 時,我們用蘭吉測度計(Lange caliper)(每平方毫米10公克的穩定壓力)測量二頭 肌、三頭肌、肩胛下肌以及腸骨上方等四處的皮脂厚度。在兩次測試之間有20 分鐘的間隔。統計方面,我們用階級內相關係數(Intraclass correlation coefficient) 來計算測試信度。用One-Way ANOVA來評估三種測量方法之間差異。實驗結果 顯示:(1)三種方法在同一測試者前後兩次測量值之間的信度(ICC1)均很高(BIA 的ICC1為0.999;IF的ICC1為0.996;SF的ICC1為0.998)(2)三種方法在測試者彼此 間的信度(ICC2)均很高(BIA的ICC2為0.999;IF的ICC2為0.995;SF的ICC2為0.994) (3)用ANOVA分析的結果,發現用生物電子阻抗儀所測的體脂肪百分比(平均值 為20.6%)和其他兩種方法所測得的數值(紅外線:平均值為23.3%;皮脂厚度: 22.6%)之間,並無顯著的差異。(中華物療誌1995;20(2):102-109) |
英文摘要 | This study was designed to examine the intrarater and interrater reliability inestimating percent body fat (fat) among bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), nearinfrared interactance (IF) and skinfold caliper (SF). Twenty young normal adults (meanage=23±2 y.o.;mean weight=60±9 kg)received repeated BIA, IF and SF measurementsby two therapists .Subjects was tested in supine position for BIA measurements(Biodynamics .Model 310). IF was measured in sitting position by Futrex-5000, andthe values were obtained from the anterior midline of the biceps. SF measurementswere taken by Lange calipers (10g/mm�� constant pressure) at biceps, triceps, subscapulrand suprailiac sites. There was 20min interval between each measurement for reliability tests which were assessed by Intraclass correlation coefficient ICC).The diffe-ence among three methods was assessed by one-way ANOVA. The results indicated:(1)the intrarater reliability (ICC��) of the three methods was high (ICC�� of BIA=0.999;ICC�� of IF=0.995: ICC�� of SF=0.994); (2)the interrater reliability (ICC�� was alsohigh in BIA (ICC��=0.999). SF (ICC�� =0.998)and IF (ICC��=0.996) (3)there was no significant difference among the fat values estimated by BIA (mean=20.6) and theother two methods (mean percent fat value of IF and SF was 23.3 and 22.6, respectively) (JPTA ROC 1995;20(2):102-109) |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。