查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 幼兒對於童話故事的道德理解之研究:以經典童話故事討論為例=A Study of Kindergarten Children' Comprehension of the Morality in Classical Fairy Tales |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 劉素卿; | 書刊名 | 教育研究與發展期刊 |
| 卷 期 | 2:2 民95.06 |
| 頁 次 | 頁93-123 |
| 分類號 | 523.23 |
| 關鍵詞 | 幼兒; 童話故事; 道德理解; 道德認知; Children; Stories; Moral comprehension; Moral cognition; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| 中文摘要 | 許多人小時候都聽過《白雪公主》與《小紅帽》的故事,也對於《傑克與魔豆》、《龜兔賽跑》、《放羊的孩子》、《醜小鴨》以及《國王的新衣》等童話故事感覺親切。但是,如果仔細審視這些經典童話故事,就會發現其中有些內容並不利於幼兒道德認知的發展。 本研究首先對上述七則故事情節中的爭議性道德問題(如狠心後母、以暴制暴等)進行文獻探討,其次藉由準實驗設計,選擇兩班大班幼兒為研究對象,分別施以「講述式」與「討論式」的故事教學,歸納教學實地札記與學習單訪談資料後有如下發現: 一、講述組幼兒對於故事的理解,呈現出刻板印象、自我中心,以及償罪性懲罰的認知特徵。 二、討論組幼兒在透過道德討論、故事改編、角色扮演的過程中,對於故事的理解呈現出概念轉化、角色認取、以及恕道懲罰的態度。 三、討論組幼兒在故事教學後,道德推理的層次顯著高於講述組幼兒,也較常併用關懷的思維考量問題。 四、有關法律與秩序的童話故事題材,比較能促進幼兒使用高階推理的能力。 五、討論式故事教學比講述式故事教學的情境更能促進師生間關於道德的對話。 |
| 英文摘要 | Almost everyone has heard about the stories such as “Snow White and the Seven Dwarves” and “Little Red Riding Hood”, and is familiar with “Jack and the Beanstalk”, “The Hare and the Tortoise”, “The Boy Who Cried Wolf”, “The Ugly Duckling” and “The Emperor’s New Clothes”. However, if we examine these classic stories, we would find some contents of these stories not good for the development of children’s moral cognition. This research, first of all, reviewed some literatures on controversial moral issues within theses stories(such as evil stepmother, an eye for an eye, etc.). Then, by means of quasi-experimental design, the researcher selected two senior classes in separate kindergartens as the research participants, and employed dictation and discussion approaches of story-telling to these children respectively. The main findings are as follows: 1. The dictation group children had shown the cognitive characteristics of stereotype, egocentrism and expiatory punishments. 2. Through moral discussion, story rewriting and role-playing, the discussion group children had developed their cognition of concepts transformation, role taking and punishment by reciprocity. 3. After story teaching, the discussion group and the dictation group children’s development of moral cognition showed significant differences. The level of moral comprehension reasoning in the discussion group is apparently higher than in the narrative group; the children in the discussion group are more likely to explore questions with care. 4. The stories concerning laws are more likely to stimulate children’s high-level reasoning ability. 5. Discussion group is more likely to stimulate conversations about morality between teachers and student than the dictation group. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。