查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 臺灣地區民眾道德判斷因果機制之研究=The Study on the Cause-Result Mechanism of Depression of Moral Judgment of People in Taiwan Area |
---|---|
作者 | 陳怡靖; 鄭燿男; Chen, I-ching; Chung, Iao-nan; |
期刊 | 國民教育研究集刊 |
出版日期 | 19991200 |
卷期 | 7 1999.12[民88.12] |
頁次 | 頁127-150 |
分類號 | 199 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 道德; 道德判斷; 因果機制; 公德; 私德; Morality; Moral judgment; Cause-result mechanism; Public morality; Private morality; |
中文摘要 | 本研究以 1994 年中央研究院完成的「臺灣地區社會變遷調查問卷」當中對於道 德判斷的十個問題及其他相關背景資料作為分析資料,提出初步的道德判斷因果機制模型。 經過因素分析結果以亂丟垃圾、說謊、工廠亂排廢水、不照顧老弱、偷工減料、倒會、逃漏 稅等七題為公德判斷題;以婚前性行為、外遇、同性戀等三題為私道判斷問題,以統計迴歸 分析、路徑分析來看影響公私德的背景因素為哪些,以及中介因素為何,以了解臺灣目前民 眾的道德判斷問題。根據本研究分析的結果,我們可以發現,影響公德與私德道德判斷的因 素各有不同。在公德判斷方面,外省人、客家人對於公德的道德判斷標準較嚴格。父親教育 程度較高以及本人教育程度較高者,公德的道德判斷標準也較嚴格。不過在宗教信仰方面, 本研究發現有宗教信仰的人,對於公德的道德判斷標準反而較寬容。至於私德方面,本研究 發現,兩性在公德標準上沒有顯著差異,可是在私德標準上卻是女性的私德標準較嚴格,亦 即女性對於性的道德方面要求較高。而父親教育較高,以及越晚出生的人對於私德的判斷標 準較寬容。另外,與前述公德的分析結果不同的地方是,本人教育對於私德的影響雖然顯著 ,但卻是負影響,亦即本人教育程度越高,對於私德(性道德觀)的標準越開放。而有宗教 信仰的人則對於私德的標準較嚴格。而研究也發現背景因素對於私德的解釋力較公德大,亦 即私德的判斷比公德的判斷受個人背景因素的影響大,顯示民眾在私德判斷方面的差異性較 大。在中介因素上,無論公德或私德方面,本人教育及宗教信仰都具有中介的作用,亦即個 人背景變項對公、私德道德判斷的影響是透過本人教育及宗教信仰的中介作用所致。因此本 研究所擬的因果模型獲得實証支持。 |
英文摘要 | The study, according to analyses often questions of moral judgment in "An Investigating List of Social Transformation in Taiwan area "devised by Academic Sinica in 1994 and other related background information, sets a primary model of cause-result mechanism of depression of moral judgement. Analyses show that seven elements are so-called the judgement of public morality such as throwing the garbage recklessly, telling lies, leaking polluted water from factories, lack of caring for elders, the insufficiency of materials when building a house, making bankrupt viciously, failing to pay taxes. The sexual behavior before making a marriage vow, having a fair, and homosexuality are three elements of the judgement of private morality. Finding that which background and intermediate factors can influence public and private morality through statistical regression and path analyses will make us understand further the present problem of moral judgement of people in Taiwan. Another analysis in the study is that moral judgement of public and private morality are decided by different factors. In general, people whose ancestors were from Mainland China and Taiwanese Hakka will have a higher standard for moral judgement of public morality. Similarly, the strict standard for moral judgement of public morality is also accepted by people and their fathers who have received high-grade education as well. The study also finds that a person with religious faith will take a generous attitude towards moral judgement of public morality. The research reveals that there, for both sexes, is no obvious differences in the standard of public morality. Female, however, will have a high standard for private morality; that is, female usually have a higher demand for sexual morality. People whose fathers have a high-grade education and were born lately will keep an open attitude for the standard of private judgement. Unlike analyses of public morality, a person's education can influence the private morality highly. But its influence is not good side. The more education a person receives, the more his attitude towards the standard of private morality (sexual morality) will be open and free. Besides, a person with religious faith will keep a higher standard for private morality. The study also shows that explanation of background factor on private morality is greater than on public morality. The influence of a personal background factor on the judgement of private morality is larger than on the judgement of public morality. That reflects great differences of people in the judgement of private morality. A person's education and religious faith have intermediate functions no matter public or private morality. Through intermediate functions of a person's education and religious faith, a person's background variable can affect the judgement of public and private morality. There fore, the model of cause-result mechanism of depression in the study has been proved. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。