頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 拒斥形而上學與建構形而上學--邏輯實證主義的奇異悖論=The Singular paradox of Logical Positivism: To Reject or Attach Metaphysics |
---|---|
作 者 | 黃穎黔; | 書刊名 | 哲學與文化 |
卷 期 | 26:12=307 1999.12[民88.12] |
頁 次 | 頁1098-1108+1187 |
分類號 | 159.6 |
關鍵詞 | 邏輯實證主義; 維也納學派; 形而上學內文; Logical positivism; Vienna circle; Metaphysics; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文圍繞拒斥與建構形而上學的現代哲學主題, 揭示以維也納學派哲學為代表的邏輯實證主義的內在矛盾。人們向來以為維也納學派拒斥形而上學最為有力。作者不同意這樣的定論。本文首先梳理了西方哲學史上建構與拒斥形而上學的演進源流,說明形而上學的共同特徵,並以此重新檢視維也納學派哲學; 然後著重分析了該學派在拒斥形而上學的同時又隱蔽地建構形而上學的哲學悖論,指出該學派的哲學立意和學科定位有唯科學主義傾向、邏輯實證方法嚴重依賴非經驗的先驗預設、統一科學的努力是在追求終極的知識體系,所有這些都伴隨著該學派產生、發展和衰落的全過程; 最後剖析了這個悖論產生的各種原因和始料不及的後果。 |
英文摘要 | This paper would like to discuss the strange circumstance of Metaphysics in the 20th century. As many philosophers are already aware, the Vienna Circe has long stood for orthodox logical positivism, which has always rejected Metaphysics. This author does not hold this view. It has been the heritage of Western philosophy to seek Metaphysics and the Vienna Circle is no exception. This paper would like to reveal a series of contradictions within the Vienna Circle. These contradictions have occurred even with conservative stands such as: an intrinsic tendency toward Scientism, its logical and demonstrable methods based on a priori hypotheses, and its Movement of Unity Science, Which led them to an illusion of ultimate knowledge. It had been Metaphysics that gave the Circle both opportunities and challenges. The Vienna Circle began by rejecting metaphysics, but regretfully had to admit Metaphysics in the end. This all can be explained using current philosophy. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。