頁籤選單縮合
題名 | An Investigation into the Opinions of Nursing Faculty Toward the RN/RPN Licensure Exams=護理教師對護理人員檢覈考試意見之調查 |
---|---|
作者 | 林麗嬋; 曾慧敏; 周治蕙; 夏萍絅; | 書刊名 | The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences |
卷期 | 15:7 1999.07[民88.07] |
頁次 | 頁428-436 |
分類號 | 419.63 |
關鍵詞 | 護理教師; 護理人員; 檢覈考試; RN/LPN licensure exam; Attitude; Opinion; |
語文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 本研究之目的在探討國內各級護理學校各科護理教師對護理人員檢覈考試試題及命題人員之看法。研究過程分為發展問卷與正式施測兩階段,第一階段樣本來自某一專科學校各科護理教師。研究方法採用錄音訪談,訪談資料經分析後編製成護理人員檢竅考試意見量表與對護理人員檢覈考試態度量表,以Kendall co-efficient of concordance檢定兩量表之內容效度分別為w=.18 (p<.01) 與w=.42 (p<.01);信度檢定Cronbaeh's分別為.84與.69。第二階段樣本來源為全國各級護理學校各科護理教師。護理教師在護理檢覈考試試題意見之得分範圍為22-65分;平均47.61分,護理人員檢覈考試命題人員態度量表之得分範圍為11-29分;平均19.16分。護理教師對護理人員檢覈考試命題人員態度與年齡、臨床經驗、教學經驗呈顯著負相關 (p<.05)。護理教師對命題人員態度越正向者,對試題意見也越趨正向 (p<.05)。臨床經驗越豐富之護理教師,其對試題意見越負向 (p<.05)。有命題經驗對護理人員檢覈考試命題人員的態度較無命題經驗教師負向,t檢定顯示有顯著差異 (p<.01)。不同學制、不同職別之護理教師對護理人員檢覈考試命題人員之態度有顯著的不同 (p<.01l)。依本研究結果,建議未來從事護理人員檢覈考試試題分析。 |
英文摘要 | The purpose of this study was to investigate opinions on the RN/LPN licensure exams held by nursing faculty teaching at vocational nursing schools, community nursing colleges and full universities. The research process consisted of questionnaire construction and major study phases. In phase I, faculty members were chosen from one community college and given tape recorded interviews which were then transcribed. Interview data were analyzed and yielded the inventories of the opinion and attitude toward the RN/LPN licensure exams. Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance was used to test the content validity and yielded w=.18 (p<0.1) for opinion and w=.42 (p<0.1) for attitude. Cronbach's Alpha was used to test internal consistency and yielded 0.84 and 0.69 respectively. In phase II, nursing faculty members were chosen from all levels of institutions offering nursing degrees in Taiwan. The responses for item opinion towards the RN/LPN licensure exams ranged from 22-65 with a mean score of 47.61; while responses for attitude towards item constructors of the licensure exams ranged from 11-29 with a mean score of 19.16. The attitude toward the RN/LPN exam constructors had significant negative correlations with age, clinical experience, and teaching experience, but had significant positive correlation with opinion towards the items on the RN/LPN licensure exams. There was significant negative correlation between the opinion towards the items on RN/LPN exams and clinical experience (p<.05). The faculty members with experience in item construction for the RN/LPN licensure exams showed a significantly greater negative opinion in the attitude towards the RN/LPN licensure exam constructors compared to faculty without experience in item construction (p<.01). A significant difference in scores of attitude toward the RN/LPN licensure exams was found with different faculty educational levels and different teaching positions within the various types of institutions (p<.01). Further studies to engage in item analysis for the RN/LPN exam are recommended. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。