頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 金批《西廂記》與張深之本、王驥德本之關係重探=A Reexamination of the Relationship between Jin Sheng-tan's Revision of the Hsi-hsiang chi and the Revisions by Zhang Shen-zhi and Wang Ji-de |
---|---|
作 者 | 林宗毅; | 書刊名 | 漢學研究 |
卷 期 | 17:2=34 1999.12[民88.12] |
頁 次 | 頁299-311 |
分類號 | 822.4 |
關鍵詞 | 西廂記; 張深之; 王驥德; 金聖歎; 分節; Hsi-hsiang chi; Zhang Shen-zhi; Wang Ji-de; Jin Sheng-tan; Segmentation; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文比較金批《西廂記》興張深之本、王驥德本之間涉及曲文異同之眉批或評點 ,並將結果表格化,發現金批《西廂記》前三本之底本仍以張深之本最近,第四本則二者皆 有可能;至於第五本也許是王驥德本,也許另有他本。繼而,因研究王驥德本而發現,原來 金聖歎「分解」《西廂記》之評點手法,乃源於王驥德之曲文「分屬」法,金氏評點的批評 ,至此都要因之重加商榷。 |
英文摘要 | The present paper makes a reexamination of the relationship between Jin Sheng-tan's revision of the Hsi-hsiang chi and the revisions by Zhang Shen-zhi and Wang Ji-de based on comparison of verse commentary. Of the five known extant copies of Jin Sheng-tan's revision of the Hsi-hsiang chi, the author has found that the first three are based on the revision by Zhang Shen-zhi, the fourth may be based on that of either Zhang Shen-zhi or Wang Ji-de, and the fifth is most likely based on that of Wang Ji- de. Upon closer examination of Wang Ji-de's revision, the author makes the surprising discovery that Jin@s use of "segmentation" (分節 ) in critiquing the Hsi-hsiang chi is based closely on the technique used by Wang. Furthermore, his use of the concepts of "density" (密 ) and "re-striction" (拘 ) also originates with Wang. In light of these discoveries,it will be necessary to reassess many of the studies done on Jin Sheng-tan's Hsi-hsiang chi commentaries over the past several hundred years. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。