查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 《才子牡丹亭》與《西廂記》之關係試探--以「褻喻」、紅娘、鶯鶯為討論中心=Research "Genius Peony Pavilion" and "The West Chamber" of Relations "Obscene Metaphor", Matchmaker, Ying-Ying Is the Center of Discussion |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 林宗毅; | 書刊名 | 藝見學刊 |
卷期 | 7 2014.04[民103.04] |
頁次 | 頁69-79 |
分類號 | 822.4 |
關鍵詞 | 才子牡丹亭; 西廂記; 牡丹亭; 吳震生; 程瓊; 褻喻; 金聖歎; Genius Peony Pavilion; The West Chamber; The Peony Pavilion; Wu, Zhen-Sheng; Cheng, Qiong; Obscene metaphor; Jin, Sheng-Tan; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 《才子牡丹亭》是一部罕見而有獨特見解的《牡丹亭》評本,是清雍正年間(1723-1735)付刻,吳震生(1695-1769)、程瓊夫婦所為,評文約三十餘萬言,評本後並附錄一些資料,〈《西廂》並附證〉就是其一。而元雜劇《西廂記》與清人戲曲評本《才子牡丹亭》,就如此巧妙地藉由明湯顯祖(1550-1616)《牡丹亭》居間媒介,有了極為奇特的連結。透過吳震生、程瓊夫婦的評點,發現其對《西廂記》的解讀有幾點是相當特別的:一是延續對《牡丹亭》曲文、賓白處處皆「男女二根」的「褻喻」說法,《西廂記》也被如此「情色想像」、解讀。二是認為《西廂記》只深寫一紅娘,且強調紅娘深解性事,欲與鶯鶯共事張生,這應該與批者吳震生、程瓊夫婦提倡「對食」有關。三是鶯鶯情欲的自主性被強化,緣於對毛大可批本《西廂記》說法的吸納,而金聖歎批本《西廂記》「秉禮」的鶯鶯未受肯定,應與《才子牡丹亭》抨擊「賢文禁殺」有密切的關聯;然而,金批本並不全然被排斥,若與《才子牡丹亭》旨趣目標一致者,仍會熔冶於一爐。 |
英文摘要 | ”Genius Peony Pavilion” is a rare and unique insight ”Peony Pavilion” Commentary, Qing Yongzheng (1723-1735) engraved , Wu, Zhen-Sheng (1695-1769) and Cheng, Qiong couples comment, Content about thirty More than a thousand words, and after some information in this appendix assessment, '”West Wing” and attach certificate' is one. The Yuan Dynasty ”The West Chamber” and the assessment of the Qing Dynasty opera ”Genius Peony Pavilion” wit 'it so skillfully by Ming Dynasty Tang, Xian-Zu (1550-1616) ”The Peony Pavilion” intervening medium, with a very strange link. Through Wu, Zhen-Sheng and Cheng, Qiong couples commentaries, found its interpretation of ”The West Chamber” There are quite a few in particular: First, a continuation of ”The Peony Pavilion” on each piece of text, ”male and female root” of ”obscene metaphor”. saying, ”The West Chamber” has been so ”erotic imagination” interpretation. The second is that ”The West Chamber” Only deep write a matchmaker, and matchmaker deep understanding of sex, want to with Ying-ying serve together on Zhang Gong, which should be approved by Wu Zhen-sheng and Cheng Qiong couples advocate ”together for food” related. Third, Ying-Ying lust autonomy is strengthened due to Mao Da-ke have awarded the ”The West Chamber” argument to absorb, but Jin, Sheng-Tan awarded the ”The West Chamber”, ”Observe the proprieties” of Ying-Ying not being taken seriously, should be ”Genius Peony Pavilion” attacked ”Binding people to death” are closely related; However, Jin, Sheng-Tan is not completely excluded from the grant, if the ”genius Peony Pavilion” purport consistent with those goals, the rule is still melting in a furnace. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。