查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 行政程序的憲法化--論行政處分之「正當程序」=Constitutionalizing the Administrative Procedure--The "Due Process" of Making Administrative Actions |
---|---|
作 者 | 廖元豪; | 書刊名 | 世新大學學報 |
卷 期 | 9 1999.10[民88.10] |
頁 次 | 頁213-267 |
分類號 | 588.13 |
關鍵詞 | 行政程序; 行政處分; 正當程序; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 行政處分一向是我國行政法學最注重的行政行為,然而學者或實務關注的焦點,多集中於行政處分「實體」上的合法性,卻較少針對行政處分「程序」上合法性加以探討。即便討論行政程序者,也多僅從各國行政程序法等「法律」之規定加以討論,而鮮有從「憲法」層面討論處分之應有程序者。然而如此的討論面向,忽視了人民亦享有憲法位階的「程序權利」。何況在各項法律充斥著不確定法律概念與行政裁量的規定時,「程序導向的控制」往往才能有效的對行政決定加以拘束。因此本文以「正當程序」(Due Process)觀念發展最為成熟的美國法制作為比較對象,擬針對行政處分的「程序」要件進行研究,試圖建構出「憲法位階」的正當程序原則,以拘束行政處分的程序。使依法行政能夠擴及「程序」上的合法性,進一步保障人民權利。 |
英文摘要 | Taiwan's scholars of administrative law always focus on the legality of "administrative action". However there are rarely writings or courts' decisions exploring the "procedural legality" of administrative actions. The author believes that "Due Process" is a requirement by the Constitution, and whenever the administrative agencies make decisions, they have to follow certain minimum procedures, or the reviewing courts have the authority to set aside the decisions in question. In addition, even in the circumstances in which the Administrative Procedure Act or other statutes never provide such minimum procedures, the reviewing court may cite the unwritten constitutional principle of Due Process to compel the agencies to adopt them. This Article applies the comparative law approach, employs the experiences of the United States to criticize Taiwan's status quo, and proposes the approach which the reviewing courts may adopt. If the courts can accept the author's suggestions, the idea of "Rule of Law" will be strengthened, and the civil rights will be guaranteed more perfectly. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。