查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 農業用水水源移用對環境生態之經濟分析以高屏溪流域水稻田為例=The Effect of Water Right Transfer on Paddy Field at the Kauping River Basin: An Environmental Analysis |
---|---|
作 者 | 彭克仲; 黃炳文; | 書刊名 | 國立屏東科技大學學報 |
卷 期 | 8:3 1999.09[民88.09] |
頁 次 | 頁223-236 |
分類號 | 434.111 |
關鍵詞 | 條件估價法; 水稻田; 外部經濟; 高屏溪流域; Contingent valuation method; Paddy; External economic kauping river basin; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 現階段農業生產活動已兼具生產、生活及生態三種功能。在生產方面,農產品可 能在自由市場獲取報酬,但生活與生態功能的發揮,卻無市場表現存在價值,造 成農業的貢獻在國民生產毛額之比重偏低。 水稻經濟效益可分為內部經濟與外部經濟的評估,本研究蓍重於外部經濟-- 水田所衍生之生活性與生態性機能之效益加以評估,以高屏溪流域為研究對象, 並配合臺灣省水利處所提供的四個方案進行評估,經研析後,獲致以下結論: 一、該流域水田存在價值效益為每人每年259.8元(高雄地區),335.38元(屏 東地區)。 二、各調度移用水稻田農業用水所造成環境生態保育損益為:方案一:28,426.5 萬餘元,方案二:27,706.1萬餘元,方案三:22,286.9萬餘元,方案四:22,190.1 萬餘元。 三、以各方案移用總水量推估平均每噸水補償金額為:方案一為631元,方案二 為1.641元,方案三為2.274元,方案四為2.394元。 |
英文摘要 | Agriculture has three functions life, production and ecology. However, the economic contribution of agricultural water use is not appropriately accounted for. The GNP accounts only for value of agricultural products, because the value shows up in the market. This paper estimated the economic value of four programs proposed by the Water Conservation Bureau at the Kauping River Basin Especially, the Contingent Valuation Method (C. V. M.) was used to estimate the external economic benefits from paddy. The major findings in this study are as follows: 1.The existence value of paddy were NT$259.8 and NT$335.38 per year per person in Kauhsing County and Pingtung County, respectively. 2.The environmental economic value of the programs at Kauping River Basin were listed below: Program I: NT$28,426.5 million Program Ⅱ: NT$27,706.1 million Program Ⅲ: NT$22,286.9 million Program Ⅳ: NT$22,190.1 million 3.The monetary compensation for per metric ton of agricultural water transfer for each program was Program I: NT$1.631 Program Ⅱ: NT$1.641 Program Ⅲ: NT$2.274 Program Ⅳ: NT$2.394 |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。