查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: Isobaric Versus Hyperbaric Solution
- The Incidence of Post Dural Puncture Headache in Taiwanese Patients Undergoing Cesarean Section
- The Preemptive Effect of Regional Anesthesia on Post-Cesaream Section Pain
- 產科照護之再省思--由減少剖腹產談起
- Pre-Anesthetic Oral Clonidine is Effective to Prevent Post-Spinal Shivering
- Low Dose Ketamine and Midazolam as Supplements for Spinal Anesthesia
- Isobaric Spinal Anesthesia for Paraplegic Patients
- Severe Delayed Postpartum Hemorrhage Following Cesarean Section
- Pregnancy in a Previous Cesarean Section Scar: Case Report
- Prevention of Hypotension after Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: Dextran 40 Versus Lactated Ringer's Solution
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: Isobaric Versus Hyperbaric Solution=剖腹產脊髓麻醉時使用等比重或高比重溶液之比較 |
---|---|
作 者 | King,Hwa-kou; Wood,LeMonte; Steffens,Zoreh; Johnson,Calvin; | 書刊名 | 麻醉學雜誌 |
卷期 | 37:2 1999.06[民88.06] |
頁次 | 頁61-64 |
分類號 | 417.372 |
關鍵詞 | 剖腹產; 脊髓麻醉; 等比重溶液; 高比重溶液; Delivery; Cesarean section; Anesthesia; Spinal; Tetracaine; |
語文 | 英文(English) |
英文摘要 | Background: The present study was undertaken to compare the outcomes of hyperbaric versus isobaric spinal anesthesia in Cesarean delivery. Methods: The anesthetic solution was administered in sitting position as this posture is commonly used in this clinical setting. Except for the baricity of the anesthetic solution, identical technique was employed for every parturient in the study. Following administration of anesthetic solution the parturient immediately resummed horizontal supine position. The solutions used were 2.0 mL of 0.5% tetracaine in 5% dextrose (hyperbaric) for Group H (n=30) and in cerebrospinal fluid (isobaric) for Group I (n=30). Results: Both hyperbaric and isobaric tetracaine given in sitting position provided adequate analgesic levels. However, hyperbaric tetracaine solution produced a slightly higher median peak level of wilder range, and caused a higher incidence of hemodynamic changes and subjective sensation of "feeling sick" than isobaric tetracaine. Additionally, the duration of surgical anesthesia was shorter and the sacral block was longer for hyperbaric tetrcaine solution than for isobaric tetracaine solution at same dose and concentration. Only one mother in Group H needed supplemental inhalation anesthesia for a subsequent hysterectomy due to uncontrollable bleeding. There were no complications, including postpuncture headache in either group. Conclusions: Our results indicated that numerous variables must be taken into consideration in predicting the outcome of a spinal anesthesia. Alternation in the technique and individual patient factor may individually or collectively produce different results. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。