頁籤選單縮合
題名 | EDI實施之成本-效益分析:由使用指標判定=Exploring the Cost-Benefit for EDI Implementation: An Assessment from the Indicator of Usage |
---|---|
作者 | 方國定; 劉雯瑜; | 書刊名 | 管理與資訊學報 |
卷期 | 4 1999.04[民88.04] |
頁次 | 頁103-127 |
分類號 | 494.59 |
關鍵詞 | 電子資料交換; 區別分析; 成本-效益分析; Electronic data interchange; Usage indicator; Discriminant analysis; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究的主要目的為:(1)比較國小普通班與資優班的創造思考教學實施狀況;(2) 探討國小資優班教師對創造思考教學的認識、興趣及運用情形。研究對象為臺灣地區的國小 資優班與普通班教師;資優班包含智優班與美術才能優異班兩類。樣本人數共計258名。本 研究用來蒐集資料的工具為研究者自編的「教師教學方法問卷」,旨在評量教師對創造思考 教學的認識、興趣、以及實際運用情形。本研究的主要發現如下:(1)國小資優班教師在創造 思考教學法之知識基礎上優於普通班教師;(2)國小資優班教師對創造思考教學法的興趣與信 念與普通班教師之間沒有顯著差異;(3)修過創造思考教學課程的教師對創造思考教學法之興 趣與信念優於未修習過創造思考教學課程的教師;(4)國小資優班教師在教學評量上比普通班 教師常運用多元化評量方法,但是運用開放式評量法的情形與普通班教師之間差異較小;(5) 國小資優班教師在教學上比普通班教師較常採用創造思考教學法。 析結果發現,以成本面的「資訊設備成本」具有最強的區別能力,「變 動成本」也略具區別能力但不強,但效率面約五個因素皆不具有區別能力。從本 研究可發現,企業對EDI使用程度的高低會明顯的反應在資訊設備成本及變動成 本上,尤其是資訊設備成本。因此,政府應該塑造有利的硬體及軟體支援環境, 以達到EDI的規模經濟,減輕企業界的成本壓力。 |
英文摘要 | The main purposes of this study were (1) to compare the teaching practice of creative thinking between Gifted/Talented (G/T) classes and general classes in elementary schools; (2) to investigate the gifted education teachers' knowledge base, attitude, and employment about creative thinking teaching. Two hundred and fifty eight teachers from 24 elementary schools were selected to participate in the research, including 107 from general classes, 91 from classes of the intellectually gifted, and 60 from classes of the artistically talented. The main instrument employed for collecting data in this study was The Questionnaire for Teaching Methods designed by the researcher. The major findings were (1) the teachers of G/T classes were superior in the knowledge base of creative thinking teaching than those of general classes; (2) there was no significant difference in the attitude toward creative thinking teaching between teachers of G/T classes and those of the general classes; (3) teachers having taken the courses about creative thinking teaching were more interested in creative thinking teaching than those having not taken; (4) the teachers of G/T classes employed more evaluating methods than those of general classes; (5) the teachers of G/T classes employed creative thinking teaching more often than those of general classes. ge indicator. The results of the discriminant analysis suggested that, while all the proposed benefit factors are not significant indicators, the change cost and the facility of information technology investment are two important discriminators. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。