查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 國中生活科技科教師實習歷程檔案(Portfolio)評鑑工具之發展=Portfolio Instrument for Assessing Preservice Teachers of Living Technology Subject at Junior High Schools |
---|---|
作 者 | 曾國鴻; | 書刊名 | 高雄師大學報 |
卷 期 | 10 1999.04[民88.04] |
頁 次 | 頁25-44 |
分類號 | 523.35 |
關鍵詞 | 評鑑; 實習評鑑; 生活科技科; 實習歷程檔案評鑑工具; Evaluation; Assessment of teaching practice; Portfolio instrdment; Living technology; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究主要係採理論探討、教學觀察、名義團體小組討論、專家審查、正式評鑑、 問卷調查等方法,發展國中生活科技科實習歷程檔案評鑑工具。首先透過由國中生活科技科 教師組成的名義團體小組討論,發展工具的內涵要項,繼由研究人員編製出工具的初稿,再 經研究人員的試驗性預試評估修正,最後經過六位學者專家會議的充份討論審查修正,以建 立工具的效度並確立工具說明書。接著由六位國中資深生活科技科教師正式評鑑五位國中生 活科技科教師,以建立工具的信度。然後針對工具的使用情形,實施評價問卷調查。結果發 現「實習歷程檔案評鑑工具」的整體Cronbach's α值高達.9355,評分者間信度為.836(p<.01), 顯示工具的信度相當好。最後,本研究依據上述研究發現,提出結論及建議。 |
英文摘要 | There were two major purposes in this research. The first purpose was to develop the instrument of Portfolio for pre-service teachers of living technology at junior high schools and their user's manual. The second purpose was to establish the validity and reliability of the instrument. The method of this research included the literature review, nominal group, panel discussions, formal evaluation, and questionnaires. The nominal group began this study with developing the content of the instrument. The draft of the instrument was made, tested, and then revised by researchers. Then, the draft was revised by panel discussion of six experts thoroughly to establish the validity of the instrument. Five senior teachers and a professor of living technology evaluated five living technology teachers. The reliability ( Cronbach's α and Kendall Coefficient of Concordance) of the instrument was high. After that, the questionnaires were implemented to investigate the response about the usage of the instruments. Finally, the conclusion and suggestions were provided based on the result above. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。