查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 從歐盟移民政策決策過程談自由派政府間主義=The Decision-Making Process Behind Coordinated EU Migration Policies--Implications for Theories in Regional Integration |
---|---|
作者 | 盧倩儀; | 書刊名 | 問題與研究 |
卷期 | 38:3 1999.03[民88.03] |
頁次 | 頁19-32 |
分類號 | 577.61 |
關鍵詞 | 歐洲聯盟; 移民政策; 區域整合; 政府間主義; 二重賽局理論; 新功能主義; The European Union; Migration policy; European integration; Intergovernmentalism; Two-level games model; Neo-functionalism; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 當今歐洲整理論的主流 — 自由派政府間主義,一方面肯定歐洲整合的重要性 ,一方面堅持區域組織沒有自主性,對會員國的行為影響有限。根據政府間主義,要解釋 歐洲整合,最重要的因素是會員國自身的利益,而包括國內以及國際兩個層次的二重賽局 理論則提供一個最好的分析模型。本文利用民主赤字嚴重的會員國間移民政策的協調說明 ,該理論模型與歐盟的實際運作並不相符。本研究顯示,歐盟架構中的組織制度及其中的 行為者對政策結果的影響力,遠超出會員國國內行為者對政策結果之影響力。 。 |
英文摘要 | This article compares the decision-making process in the area of coordinated migration policies within the EU and the decision-making pattern liberal intergovernmentalists have posited under the two-level games model. While the two-level games model requires a strong democratic control mechanism, the decision-making in the area of coordinated migration policies is characterized by the so-called "democratic deficits." The serious problem of the democratic deficits provides strong evidence for the missing link between the interests-formation in pluralist societies on the one hand, and intergovernmental negotiations on the other. Contrary to the model formulated by intergovernmentalists and confirming neo-functionalist conviction, decision-making in this area bears strong supranational idiosyncrasies. Intergovernmentalists have obviously underestimated the importance of elites and technocrats in shaping policy outcomes. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。