頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 藝術類術科教學評量研究--以臺北市立師範學院美勞教育學系為個案=Art Work Evaluation--A Case Study at Arts and Crafts Department, Taipei Municipal Teachers College |
---|---|
作者 | 林清平; | 書刊名 | 臺北市立師範學院學報 |
卷期 | 30 1999.03[民88.03] |
頁次 | 頁451-473 |
分類號 | 903 |
關鍵詞 | 藝術類術科; 教學評量; 學生參與評量; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究旨在瞭解藝術類術科教學評量問題,作藝術類術科教學評量改進與研究兩方 面的參考。因此,本研究的主要目的有: 一、瞭解學生對藝術類術科教學評量的感受與看法。 二、分析不同背景因素學生對藝術類術科教學評量的感受與看法之差異情形。 三、研擬藝術類術科教學評量之參考策略。 研究結果,獲致下列結論: 本研究依據調查資料分析結果及重要研究發現獲致下列結論: 一、學生對藝術類術科教學評量的感受與看法: 1.學生對於各個藝術類術科科目的學期成績還能接受。 2.學生對藝術類術科成績的在意程度情形,較在乎自己的成績,而不太重視與班上同學 相互比較。 3.學生對「授課教師對藝術類術科評量的客觀性」,抱持懷疑的態度。 4.學生與授課教師對「藝術類術科作業(品)『好』與『不好』」有不同的看法。 5.學生能客觀的參與藝術類術科之「學生參與評量」。 6.學生對於藝術類術科教學評量的看法,傾向能?師生共同參與評量;同時,對於「藝 術類術科的期末作業(品)評量」宜由系上相關的老師組成會審團共同評量。 二、不同「年級」的學生對藝術類術科教學評量的感受與看法有差異性存在;學生的「性別」 與「美勞興趣」不會造成對藝術類術科教學評量的感受與看法之差異。 三、在授課老師對藝術類術科的成績評量中,學生期望除了獲得一個成績外,還能獲得更多 的內容。 最後,本研究根據研究結論提出建議,以作為研擬藝術類術科教學評量和進一步研究之 參考。 |
英文摘要 | This study is to investigate problems on evaluating art work and provide a reference to improving art work evaluation and further research. The main purposes of this study are 1. investigating student's opinion on art work evaluation, 2. analyzing factors that cause differences in student's opinion, 3. proposing strategies for evaluation art work. The results are 1. Student's opinion a. Students are able, generally speaking, to accept their grades. b. The student's interest in art work evaluation focuses at her/his own score, with less interest in comparing her/his score with the other student. c. Students doubt the objectivity of professor's evaluation. d. There are differences between student's and professor's judging on whether an art work is good or not. e. Students are able to participate in art work evaluation objectively. f. Students prefer evaluation by both professor and student; meanwhile, they consider it adequate that their term art work should be evaluated by a group of related professors of the department. 2. Students of different years (freshman, sophomore, junior, and senior) have different opinions on art work evaluation; while "Gender" and "Art and Craft Interest" do not cause different opinions. 3. Students whish to know more about the content of professors' evaluation rather than know just the "one" score. At last, this study provide suggestions for art work evaluation and further research. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。