查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 探索「傳播媒體內容管制規範之價值體系」:法學方法與傳播研究接軌的問題--一項研究的批判性記述=Searching "Value System in Content Regulation of the Media": A Critical Note on Methodological Problematics in Combining Legal Theory and Communication Research |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 石世豪; | 書刊名 | 新聞學研究 |
卷期 | 58 1999.01[民88.01] |
頁次 | 頁201-239 |
分類號 | 890 |
關鍵詞 | 方法論; 跨科際; 價值理論; 法律規範; 媒體管制; 法律解釋; Methodology; Interdisciplinary; Value theories; Legal norms; Media regulation; Legal interpretation; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 傳播媒體法律規範的研究,究竟是否「專屬」於傳統法學研究的範疇,抑或是傳 播研究領域內的「特殊」議題,甚至,因而不適用歷來法學研究的方法?本篇文字,係根據作 者參與「傳播媒體內容管制規範之價值體系」研究所遭遇的相關方法(論)問題為例,嘗試探 索「跨科際整合」研究在方法論上的實踐意涵。本篇結論認為:過於急切縱入方法操作而不反 思其理論基礎,將無益於法學與傳播研究兩個學科的接軌;將相關議題按不同學科既有研究 重點硬行切割、再相互搭連塊狀研究單元的不得已分工模式,亦非「跨科瞭整合」理想下所 應有的專業互動模式。終久之道,仍須就共通議題深入個別學科基礎,並且保持方法論上的 自我批判態度,藉此發展學科之間真正的合作關係。 |
英文摘要 | Does the research of media regulation norms, like legal issues in the other domains, exclusively fall into the field of traditional legal studies? Or, rather constitute those studies contemplated by communication researchers a specialized regime within their discipline and thus can justify marginalizing every legal method in this respect? The author documents some methodological problems that he has experienced in the project "Value System in Content Regulation of the Media" After exposing some underlying weaknesses and shortage of inter-disciplinary co-operation he then sums up with a critical and reflective stance. Any haste in dividing issues according to the status quo of each discipline or in grasping available methods would rarely contribute further to the interdisciplinary co-operation in a long-term point of view. Only after a common intellectual basis has been found, then there can be more promising outlooks for researchers to integrate achievements of both disciplines in exploring a new horizon. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。