頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 國際貿易反競爭行為影響市場進入之問題:以國際仲裁解決相關爭端之可行性=The Anticompetitive Practices Impairing the Market Access on International Trade: The Feasibility of Settling the Related Disputes by the International Arbitral Mechanism |
---|---|
作 者 | 李貴英; | 書刊名 | 中原財經法學 |
卷 期 | 4 1998.12[民87.12] |
頁 次 | 頁163-179 |
分類號 | 558.4 |
關鍵詞 | 國際貿易; 反競爭行為; 國際仲裁; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 企業所採取之反競爭行為對於國際貿易與投資往往造成負面影響,且此等行為種類繁多。某些國內企業可運用水平或垂直之限制阻撓外國企業進入本國市場。尤有甚者,此等行為若受到其本國政府所採取之保護政策予以支持者,對於外國企業進入該國市場之機會影響甚鉅。在此種情況下,外國企業進入某國國內市場之機會,若因該國國內企業所採取之反競爭行為而蒙受損害時,似可考慮訴諸國際仲裁以解決私人業者之間因反競爭行為而影響市場進入方面之爭端。有鑒於世界貿易組織之爭端解決機制基本上主要係針對會員國政府之行為,而非私人業者之行為所造成的問題,故此建立一套仲裁機制以提供私人業者尋求直接救濟之管理,似為十分有效之工具。 |
英文摘要 | The anticompetitive business practices that could have harmful effects on international trade and investment opportunities are numerous. These practices include horizontal and vertical restraints used by local firms to prevent foreign competitors from being able to gain access to a domestic market. And these anticompetitive practices, sometimes supported by protectionist policies of the home government, exert a potential harmful inhibitory effect on market access. In such cases, one foreign firm may claim injury as a result of its market access opportunities being impaired by the anticompetitive conduct of the local firms. An international arbitral mechanism to settle the disputes related to the anticompetitive conduct of private parties might be feasible, especially when the claims brought to dispute settlement in the WTO context essentially concern actions of a governmental nature and do not cover market access barriers arising out of private behavior. The establishment an arbitral mechanism to which private parties have direct access may represent a useful instrument. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。